![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Freddy at one point in this sport's not so distant past people with stables like Live Oak weren't excited to run 40-1 shots in races they really don't belong in. Not saying that they shouldn't be excited to win the Bluegrass regardless of how irrelevant the race has become. Another pretty much unsaid factor on why we dont have any good older horses anymore is so many of them are ruined on this crusade to "qualify" for the Derby. Not necessarily the bunch in the Bluegrass because most are just pokey turf horses for the most part. Look at Crimson China. Not only has he never run on dirt, Motion never even works the horse on dirt! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dynaformer can produce a dirt horse just 90% of them aren't and Brilliant Speed hasn't given any indication that he is.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perfect Drift, Dynever, Barbaro just to name a few OK dirt horses?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
He breeds 100+ mares a year for 15 years...you named 3 and I will give you Purim as well.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Freddy practices Jon Kyl math.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
3 of his best and largest earners no?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Of the top 100 earners in American racing how many of them were exclusively turf horses?
That he can get a dirt runner is not the point. That this particular runner hasn't given any indication that he wants to be a dirt runner is another story. He isn't Danehill but the vast majority dont dirt too much. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|