![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://www.thewheelerreport.com/rele...31laborers.pdf
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.channel3000.com/news/27392391/detail.html
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts Last edited by Riot : 03-31-2011 at 11:50 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
It appears the GOP thinks their legal defense only needs to be, unbelievably, "Judge,we refuse to appear in your court - so take away the restraining order until we have the time to give you some time"
![]() The strange thing is this: the GOP could make this all go away, by simply just re-passing the bill in the legislature and the senate. So why isn't Walker doing that? Just re-vote on the bill. The only reason could be that he no longer has the votes to pass his union-busting bill The overwhelming public anger and the recalls must have scared off GOP who would not vote the same way again.Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There is no point in arguing with a liberal judge who has an agenda. The argument is that the judicial system has no right to be involved with the process until the law is in effect. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1b-eg-O9O4 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
ad's are slanted. theirs are. so are yours. it's in their nature. i'm surprised anyone gets worked up over these. it's like having true passion for pepsi. i think you only think that brand of fizzy sugar water tastes better. and maybe it really does to you. but using the pepsi challenge as evidence only reinforces the idea you're an idiot. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You think it's better to keep the guy who called his boss "bitch", threatened to "destroy her", and has said he'll act as a "compliment" to Walker? Seems he's offended quite a few people with his arrogant rudeness. Too bad for him it came out right before his re-election. And talk about "judicial activism" - he's running for election, for the position as an impartial judge, by stating his political biases and promising to fulfill them? Yeah, let's have more of that ![]()
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |