![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quiet Giant has the same type of look and feel to her IMO. Actually her races look a little bit better early on in her career. 1-5 morning line in the 5th at Aqueduct tomorrow coming off 92 and 96 beyer blowouts. Maybe she turns out to be really good.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() You are with Giant's Causeway what Betsy is with A.P. Indy.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Don't forget IC!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It has nothing to do with that at all. They honestly have nothing in common? The truth is, at this point Quiet Giant is better then L@T was.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm not sure about that - and if so - is that really worthy of a thread?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Looking at some of the threads on the main page, Id say yes. Horses taking dives into lakes and wind direction.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Wind direction strongly impacts fractional time, in terms of final time - it breaks up set relationships on a parallel time chart - it also can impact outcomes of races ... and the more I study it - the more I think it can be a factor of predicting track biases before they even occur at a few certain tracks. It also can cause tracks to cancel ... as it did today.
How often do horses jump in infield lakes? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Considering that you think Indy would have beaten Bernardini, I find that an extremely ironic statement.
|