Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
There are 25000 less races than in 1989. Dont you think THAT is a response to the market?
Do you seriously think reducing the scope of the industry is going to influence govt in a positive manner?
We all know that we are basically held hostage by racinos and effect govt. But what you are saying is that the hostage committing suicide is a better option than being held hostage.
The problem is that the price of this form of gambling is not competitive in the market place. Reducing the number of tracks or races doesn't change this.
|
WTF--influence govt? Govt is floating racing in most places, to "save jobs" (aka welfare). My point to you is the opposite--it needs to conform to the market, which the government should withdraw from.
Maybe a handful of states need to really be breeding states--propping up Iowa, or Indiana, or NJ, or a bunch of other bogus breeding states is
BS. Never would happen in a free market.
02-10-2011, 03:37 PM
Threaded Mode