Healthcare repeal fails

[Riot]

lol yeah, it's not remembered. probably because it doesn't happen. not regarding your president. you bought his hope and change hook, line and sinker. perfectly understandable. what you fail to see is that you're dell, you're timmi. just for the other side. and you get so upset with them. it's really hilarious. (no offense to tim and dell, really). but let's call a spade a spade, riot. you're many things, being impartial is certainly not one of them.

No, I'm not impartial. Never said I was otherwise, so if that's your final line, yeah, guilty. I support the President and am very happy with what he does, for the most part.

I haven't seen Dell and Timm back up their arguments with much more than "Obama and the Democrats suck!". Maybe I missed that?

as for you posting 'facts'. people on opposite points of view can always find stuff to back up there argument.

That would be wonderful if people would actually do that here - that would lead to some good debate, don't you think?

Then you wouldn't have to unfairly tell Nascar that unemployed people are not freeloaders. That's not nice of you. His opinion is just the same as yours. You've apparently bought hook, line and sinker into the "poor unemployed" BS the Democrats are putting out, Danzig.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, I'm not impartial. Never said I was otherwise, so if that's your final line, yeah, guilty. I support the President and am very happy with what he does, for the most part.

I haven't seen Dell and Timm back up their arguments with much more than "Obama and the Democrats suck!". Maybe I missed that?



That would be wonderful if people would actually do that here - that would lead to some good debate, don't you think?

Then you wouldn't have to unfairly tell Nascar that unemployed people are not freeloaders. That's not nice of you. His opinion is just the same as yours.

no, what typically happens is something is posted, and whoever is on the opposite side attacks the site linked to. facts typically are cited that support one's point of view. people will do a search, and cull the results-link to those they agree with( thus, are true) while ignoring those that offer an opposing view (thus, obviously not true).

and yes, some unemployed people are freeloaders. you don't believe that, because you can't grasp the concept-because it's not something you would do, so you don't understand it in others. but some folks are absolutely perfectly content to live on the dole. or, they work under the table for cash to supplement their u/e income. most people who have to file want another job, but some do not. perhaps their spouse works, perhaps they can work with their buddy for cash...who knows?
my brother is a freeloader, i find him an embarrassment. he went out on disability from the dcfd for a bad back. they offered him a desk job, but he said he couldn't sit or stand long without pain. so, on the dole he went. my dad offered him part time work to supplement the disability, as he can earn so much per month. nope.
as for not sitting or standing for long...he sure spends hours and hours sitting in a wooden chair playing WOW online.

and did i mention that he, his wife, and four kids (and two dogs) live with my folks? going on three years...but he's sure proud of that cadillac escalade he drives (arnold palmer edition). but yeah, he can't afford his own place...

that mentality exists. saying that all on assistance are milking the system is no truer than saying none are. perfect example of all the glorious debate on here. the truth in so many things lies somewhere in between the polar opposites arguing their point ad infinitum.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

no, what typically happens is something is posted, and whoever is on the opposite side attacks the site linked to. facts typically are cited that support one's point of view. people will do a search, and cull the results-link to those they agree with( thus, are true) while ignoring those that offer an opposing view (thus, obviously not true)..

Uh ... naw. That would be nice, but no. Derby Trail is usually far more limited to the intellectually stimulating, " ---- sucks! You suck!"

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Riot

Uh ... naw. That would be nice, but no. Derby Trail is usually far more limited to the intellectually stimulating, " ---- sucks! You suck!"

that doesn't happen? 'you cited huffington, how dare you? 'well, you linked to foxnews, it's fake'. 'oh, cause your cnn was so much better'....back and forth. it really is funny.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

that doesn't happen? 'you cited huffington, how dare you? 'well, you linked to foxnews, it's fake'. 'oh, cause your cnn was so much better'....back and forth. it really is funny.

Yeah, I'm all about the above conversation. Sure. And we are inundated with factual links from Dell and Timmi. Sure.