:zz:

[my miss storm cat]

Originally Posted by Thunder Gulch

After watching things settle to some norm after the early voting distortions, it would still be interesting to see how many votes were cast for each. One of the real problems as others have noted, is that it's a popularity contest. New fans without historical perspective or familiarity of all (or most) of the horses vote for a handful and move on (the Zenyatta fans also throw in a 3 for Rachel Alexandra and Blame). If all you know is Barbaro, Curlin, Zenyatta, and Secretariat, you're likely to selectively vote for just those and give them all 10's. If you go through the list and try to rate each, you end up placing much lower numbers on the likes of Barbaro, Curlin, Bernardini, AP Indy when you compare them to Count Fleet, Citation, Bid, Forego, Damascus, and Dr. Fager who were all time greats from another generation.

True but look (and these are just random things I was reading in the past half hour)...

1. Apparently horse racing disappeared...

http://www.cbssports.com/info/siteindex

2. Yeah I know the it's from the funny papers (oioops I mean the Los Angeles Times), but...

(Bowling did better???)

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/spor...rris-poll.html

Numbers can be tweaked to say what you want them to, we all know it aint like it's as popular as football but this is why... these little indicators, these constant things...

The new fans are doing just as you say but it's their beginning and hopefully they'll see these names a few times and want to find out more... read up and see replays.

They

will

play.

If they're hoooked they will play in time so let's maybe gently nudge them into reality re the champions, etc., instead of being such azzholes about it (not you, just in general and I include myself. I have no patience if I'm at the track and the person in front of me is taking ******* forever so I need to work on that).