|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
12-15-2010, 09:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
for slotdirt: according to people who know what they are talking about, on paper, they seem to match up pretty damn well.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/hotsto...son&id=5920160
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#2
12-15-2010, 09:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Says Jayson Stark the former Phillies beat writer for the Philadelphia Inquirer.
ETA that antitrust obviously didn't read the last few lines of Stark's article: But beyond that, it's a reminder of something more important: Great as this Phillies rotation might look, it hasn't done anything yet. It's just four names printed out on a roster. Period. They might be four awfully famous names, with already-spectacular track records. But until they actually pitch together, dominate together and win together, anyone who tries to compare them with the great rotations in history is just speculating -- or dreaming.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." Last edited by slotdirt : 12-15-2010 at 09:47 AM.
|
|
#3
12-15-2010, 09:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
ZIPS projections have the 2011 Phillies rotation as the 15th best of all time. Like I was saying yesterday, it's obviously a great rotation, but let's not get ahead of ourselves with this "best of all time" nonsense.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
|
|
#4
12-15-2010, 09:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I could care less about Stark's opinion... and he's absolutely correct with the above... but I posted the article so you could read the credible opinions of people in MLB who were associated with those past great rotations.
__________________
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
