![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Few potential classic colts race before mid August. To Honor and Serve is typical. He debuted near the end of Saratoga and since he didn't win, his connections didn't see fit to try stakes as the Champagne is all that was available in NY. They got him his maiden win but by then it was too late to try the BC and why should they take a maiden winner and toss him to Uncle Mo and Boys at Toscanova and the better colts from Cali? More and more "potential classic colts" are being handled this way. Ten years ago everyone was agog at Drysdale pointing to the Derby with FuPeg when he didn't break his maiden 'til Santa Anita. Now we're comfortable with the idea that the Derby or Preakness winner might not have ever raced yet.
__________________
RIP Monroe. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Certainly in the last few years some colts and fillies have bucked tradition (eg Curlin, Big Brown, Bernardini, Rags To Riches) but I hardly think it was necessarily by design. Physical issues seemed to hold those types back more than anything. Going by this year's waif-like BC Juvenile, your theory would seem more sound. But if trainers were really "holding back" then you'd anticipate that races like the Remsen and Kentucky Jockey Club would have been deep, contentious races. That wasn't the case. Instead, it looks like it will simply be a lean year. The reason for the odd campaigning this year by certain trainers (Pletcher, Asmussen, Dutrow) was probably a consequence of distinct physical problems with individual horses (Kantharos, perhaps Boys Of Toscanova), not an attempt to get to the Classics (8 months later) in a new, unorthodox manner. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let's Not forget that Frankel could be "one of the ones" so the Europeans hopefully will have a new super star to enjoy.... hopefully....
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Rollo. Is there rumor of something wrong with boys? I was unaware of this... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Purely speculation on my part.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Waif-like??
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I used "light" earlier, so I didn't want to repeat myself.
|