![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ok
__________________
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() He does a write up in the NY Daily News for every racing day. Obviously he had no real material or isn't smart enough to find/create a real story so instead he took a non event and tried to make it into a real story/big deal.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
MTH, more often than not, focus on the winner of the race as it gallops out and then makes its way back to the paddock area, RATHER than a replay of the stretch run. This can be very infuriating when the finish is very close. NYRA is very good at replaying the stretch run (a few times). However, even when slowed down, sometimes, due to the angle, it's not exactly evident which horse won a particular race. This is where the photo comes into play. Of course, when it comes into play 45 minutes AFTER the fact, it's basically of no use to anyone. As it's not really a MAJOR task to put a ****in' picture on a website, not doing so is thus an 'event'. We pay our money when we bet; the NYRA employees really should then just do the job they're being paid for. It's not like we're asking for some major s h i t: like, actually having them do mic checks before they broadcast. I mean, what would a NYRA broadcast be like if we didn't have to constantly adjust the volume: Serling is ALWAYS too LOW, relative to Blewitt; and both are too low relative to Durkin. Clearly, this is not 'someone's job'. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As far as the picture goes, don't they usually show a photo on the feed after they put up the prices? So what we are talking about (or what at least I percieve it to be) is the actual photo being put on the website. Which I guess would be nice, but in this case took longer to post than usual. But I don't understand what's so important about having the photo immediately posted after the race. There is nothing that Joe public can do with that photo except see how much they won or lost by. I'm not sure what you mean, when you say that the photo could come into play. Unless they somehow figure in your handicapping. Based on the blurb in the paper, it seems like the NYRA employees answer is what lead to all the negativity. Was it a good answer, absolutely not. If he said something like it was crazier than usual today because it was closing day and it was just an oversight, then the article is probably even posted. But it sounds like Jerry Bossert didn't like the answer and all of a sudden wants to be a crusader on everything that's wrong with racing and apparently he couldn't find a bigger and better issue to come up with.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Not that it has anything to do with this situation, I wonder how Australian races have the photo posted, and the first five placings determined before the horses have galloped out? Oh, did I mention that they have 10-20 horses running and half the time there are 4 horses on the wire simultaneously.
__________________
"Let the whiners and lazy cry about how impossible "they've" made it to win at this game." - Steve Byk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|