![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
One got an insane amount of hype, the other gets little to no respect. Invasor in this group would be 7/5. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
LaL? Zenyatta will be the equivalent of Bernardini, not him. And let's be real, Bernardini would eat Lookin at Lucky's lunch.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beaten fav at CD in the Classic?
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe, but I was going for the unbeatable superhorse bandwagon. Like I said, if she were somehow equal odds as Lookin at Lucky, I'd be all over her in a head-to-head wager.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Got it. Guess it would depend the circumstances between those two. As the Classic looks right now, I would probably lean towards Lucky.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
We have no idea how it looks right now. We know of five or six horses pointing to the race. Predicting pace scenarios 2+ months out is futile IMO.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
True, but what we know of the 5 or 6 horses makes a difference no? We have 2 real closers, one very fast horse (when ridden that way) a solid mid pack stalker who wins a lot more than he loses. And Richards Kid I guess. Just those few make a pretty fun hypothetical scenario. How else can we bet future odds?
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
As would Invasor to Blame.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Strongly disagree. Blame is a very good horse. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I get it. He beat the immortal QR.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thats not all he has done.
|