![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Uncle Mo is a freak. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nice based on what? They were all first time starters.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hype from connections for all that's worth. It will be fun to keep track of. I think the 1 could be any kind.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hype from connections isn't worth much to me. West Point likes every horse they own. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Violette to develop a 2 year old.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Violette has done pretty well with 2 yr olds over the years if I'm not mistaken. Readthefootnotes was pretty strong.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's one of how many? He's an exceptional first out trainer, but they rarely do much past October of their 2 year old year. Seriously think about how many 2 year olds he's had in the last 5 years. How many have won a stake at 3?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dream rush. Litigation risk will win one this fall
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
15 have won at 3 and only 2 of those have won stakes (Dream Rush and Summer Doldrums). For the amount his owners have paid for those horses and for all the very good looking maiden wins they have had, those numbers are just not very good. There are a few in here that skew the results to make them look better than they are too. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nice dapples.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's a very tough race to use also-rans for perspective since it was all firsters. The Contessa took CRAZY $, but barely left the gate, so it's hard to point to the hype surrounding him as a positive for Mo.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The wizzard talked the Contessa up and bet him hard to win, if I remember correctly. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unfortunately I used this horse...that was a lot of money to pay for him.
|