Welcome home

timmgirvan · #1 08-21-2010, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

one sniper and a box of bullets would have been a lot cheaper, quicker, and less painful for a lot of military families.

You know that would be against the law, and we can't have that can we?

Danzig · #2 08-21-2010, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

You know that would be against the law, and we can't have that can we?

yeah, that's bull. why is it ok to sent thousands of troops, but not a couple? we train snipers, but can only use them against some of the enemy. pffft.

clyde · #3 08-21-2010, 12:46 PM

The whole world is just one big ol' Pleasantville!!!!

timmgirvan · #4 08-21-2010, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig

yeah, that's bull. why is it ok to sent thousands of troops, but not a couple? we train snipers, but can only use them against some of the enemy. pffft.

That's Congress and the U.N.......

Riot · #5 08-21-2010, 04:54 PM

We tried to take out bin Laden with snipers, we failed (like with Saddam).

dellinger63 · #6 08-22-2010, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riot

We tried to take out bin Laden with snipers, we failed (like with Saddam).

I thought Bubba said 'don't shoot'?

Rupert Pupkin · #7 08-22-2010, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I thought Bubba said 'don't shoot'?

I believe it was Clinton's National Security Advisor Sandy Berger that said, "Don't shoot." Then Berger tried to steal the papers that documented this.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...022001344.html

Riot · #8 08-22-2010, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I thought Bubba said 'don't shoot'?

I'm talking Bush.