Questions for Zenyatta Fans. . .

[hockey2315]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

For some reasson your taking personal shots at me, I dont really know why...
So I will say this, Im pretty sure you told me last year Z was better then Rachel. Im also pretty sure you told me Z would like 10f a lot better, we are talking about 12 months now so I might be wrong. There are how many Z threads up right now, this could not fit in somewhere else? The surface is not irrelevant??? WTF, how is the surface not important? Your such a ****ing know it all about everything and I dont think you realize how smug you come off sometimes. If anything I have no problem at all bashing the connections, but I think its clear she likes dirt more, she just moves better over it and seems to win MUCH EASIER.

It's hard not to take personal shots when you come at me with something so weak. . . First of all. . . I NEVER said Z was better. Never ever ever ever. . . Maybe I said she would have won the Woodward.

I was trying to prove a multi-tiered point, but it was stupid of me to try here.

Now listen - one more time.

Many have claimed that the reason Zenyatta only beats her VASTLY inferior opponents (I don't disagree with the inferior part) by small margins in some cases is that she is "toying" with them in some way. . . that she's just so superior that she can keep them behind her by just enough every time without ever really fully extending herself. But, if this theory holds any weight, then why did she win the Apple Blossom by so many lengths? Hmm. . .

There were a few answers that could have been acceptable and held merit, but it's clear that Zenyatta fans, like yourself, are incapable of having an intelligent, rational conversation about her. . . you all kind of sound like religious nuts to me.

Smug enough for you?