|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
08-08-2010, 10:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
#2
08-08-2010, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I asked--specifically and clearly--how she was able to win a race by 4 1/4 lengths (the surface is irrelevant) if she's always running down to her competition?
|
|
#3
08-08-2010, 10:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't care really. Who does she run against next? Bernie from that popular 80's movie?
|
|
#4
08-08-2010, 10:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For some reasson your taking personal shots at me, I dont really know why... So I will say this, Im pretty sure you told me last year Z was better then Rachel. Im also pretty sure you told me Z would like 10f a lot better, we are talking about 12 months now so I might be wrong. There are how many Z threads up right now, this could not fit in somewhere else? The surface is not irrelevant??? WTF, how is the surface not important? Your such a ****ing know it all about everything and I dont think you realize how smug you come off sometimes. If anything I have no problem at all bashing the connections, but I think its clear she likes dirt more, she just moves better over it and seems to win MUCH EASIER.
|
|
#5
08-08-2010, 10:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I was trying to prove a multi-tiered point, but it was stupid of me to try here. Now listen - one more time. Many have claimed that the reason Zenyatta only beats her VASTLY inferior opponents (I don't disagree with the inferior part) by small margins in some cases is that she is "toying" with them in some way. . . that she's just so superior that she can keep them behind her by just enough every time without ever really fully extending herself. But, if this theory holds any weight, then why did she win the Apple Blossom by so many lengths? Hmm. . . There were a few answers that could have been acceptable and held merit, but it's clear that Zenyatta fans, like yourself, are incapable of having an intelligent, rational conversation about her. . . you all kind of sound like religious nuts to me. Smug enough for you?
|
|
#6
08-08-2010, 10:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lisa's Booby Trap will viciously attack Zenyatta in the BCC post parade for giving her man a provocative neigh in the paddock.
Then Captain Ahab will celebrate Boobies stunning win in the BCC by heading over to The Thoroughbred Lounge on Dixie and finding solace in a bottle of Evan Williams and a few rounds of motorboatin.
|
|
#7
08-08-2010, 10:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Hillary Clinton 2016: The "Extremely Careless" Leadership America Needs!
|
|
#8
08-08-2010, 10:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think Z is better, I like Rachel. I hope she kills the PE. That's been my stance all along, I respect and appreciate Rachel, but I think Z is better. Pretty simple, no?
|
|
#9
08-08-2010, 10:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hockey, the simple answer is because she's not toying with anyone.
She was all out in her last two races and clearly laying her body down and straining. The whip was out both times. It's hard to win by big margins in synthetic races - and even harded when the pacesetters go slow and have some finish left in them. On dirt - she blew by Taptam and Be Fair because both horses were running early - and you have to run harder throughout on dirt. They are more demanding races - and will be won by margins. Basically - the notion that she's measuring these horses and could have won by larger margins is competely idiotic.
|
|
#10
08-08-2010, 10:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
08-08-2010, 10:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
08-08-2010, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Your out of control.
|
|
#13
08-08-2010, 10:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
08-08-2010, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ill stay out now, excuse me....Ill try to stay out.
|
|
#15
08-08-2010, 10:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
However, his handling of her sucks bigtime if you're a serious racing fan who likes to see good match-ups. Worst of all ... I hate her fans. Her fans I've encountered on facebook have only been like gas on the fire.
|
Hybrid Mode
