|
|
 |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which tax approach would be the most "fair"? | |||
| The current income tax system - many rates, higher rates for more affluent people. |
  
|
5 | 23.81% |
| One income tax rate - (i.e. make twice as much, pay twice as much) |
  
|
8 | 38.10% |
| Per capita tax - everyone pays same tax regardless of income level |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| European style VAT tax assessed at each stage of product development, assembly, and sale. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| National sales tax, assessed at last sale only - not during assembly or production |
  
|
4 | 19.05% |
| Some other system, either thought of already or yet to be drafted up |
  
|
4 | 19.05% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#19
06-23-2010, 09:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
regular joe's should not be able to own assault / (semi) automatic rifles. It just doesnt make sense.
yes we should...crime is lower when you have the ability to defend your house.. as for handguns..eh the whole ban thing isnt working out in chi very well..10 shootings a week or so. 
|
Threaded Mode