![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
no doubt it's a nice card, but is it 13 races? at any rate, i can understand taking off the day after an undertaking like that. and between spring and fall, belmont won't miss a sunday card, whereas i'd think saratoga would.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
They usually have at least 12.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
but I dont think people can compare Saratoga's attendance to anywhere else.. simply a different (and better) breed!
__________________
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Or are you just playing the contrarian card in an attempt to make yourself look smarter than everyone else? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
1. Cleanup after the big event 2. NYRA having run 10 cards in 11 days. 3. Employees worked unusually long hours on Saturday 4. Hangover effect after big days that other venues have chosen to skip 5. Travis showed that there was no handle bump after the derby or preakness showing that they weren't missing out on an unusually good day of racing. other potential reasons 6. union wages are cheaper on weekdays 7. potential of a carryover is greater due to the nature of the belmont card and only Gales will argue that leadup time isn't better in these situations Perhaps these reasons arent good enough for you guys but i find it hard to believe that anyone thinks that taking Sunday off wasn't a good idea. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just don't think that anyone is giving consideration to the people that work at the track either. This is their biggest day of the year. Gates opened at (I believe 8:30) for a 11:35 first post. The last race went off at 7:50. It's not like they shut the lights off and go home at 8 o'clock after the last race goes official. I'm thinking that many people were there very late that night, cleaning up after such a big day. Most likely after working there for the entire day. All this coming in a span where they raced 10 times in 11 days.
But then again if they did put together a card for Sunday for the sake of just racing for a 11th time in 12 days and it came up below par, people would have chastised NYRA for not anticipating a carryover. Then they would have bitched and moaned about the crappy card that they would be looking at for such a big carryover. It just seems like some people like to bitch and moan reguardless of what goes on there.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's the racing fan way.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As far as the bitching and moaning goes, I really believe that if they did race on Sunday and the card wasn't up to some people's speed then there would be posted threads about that around here. I just don't understand what the big deal is about one dark Sunday.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
matt the card is the card, 1 stakes /feature race would have been fine......... we live in ny you cannot simply tell me that the facility itself could not have been ready for sunday , to even suggest that is a farce when in the past they have run on that sunday people want a day off i get it, take mon - wed of this week off , start racing on thursday no? not everyone can play during the week, some of nyra customers are weekend only players , but that doesn't seem to matter to anyone here besides Homer S. the weekend only players lost out on a card and a potential pick 6 play ....not everyone has a phone account/ not everyone has the internet ....some people work during the week and cannot physically get to the track or an otb location to make a play or they simply don't have the time during the week. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The idea that business on Sunday post-Belmont day is so much better than business on Thursday that all other considerations should be tabled is mistaken. And the irony of people like you always prefacing NYRA with terms like 'cash strapped' ignore the reality that the reason they are cash strapped is that they aren't getting a significant portion of their share of the handle, not that they are making poor management decisions. I would think that you would be focusing on the final days of Monmouth since you are the Prophet of Doom there as well. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Suggesting we should have closed on Thursday and run on Sunday suggests a complete disconnect. It is, quite frankly, nonsensical.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ummm sarcasm. But I apologize. I hate being unproductive.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
2008 was the first year that NYRA did not run the Sunday after the Belmont. For two years prior, divisions of the NY Stallion Series were the "feature" races that day, so MaTH716 is probably correct that, if NYRA were running on Sunday with a big carryover and those races as the "featured" attractions, many on here likely would have been complaining about the quality of the card.
For many of the reasons stated elsewhere in here (the 13-race cards on Belmont Day are only a recent phenomenom), I totally understand why they did not run on Sunday. If I had to criticize the recent racing schedule, in the face of what NYRA officials have acknowledged as a dwindling horse population, it was a mistake to run the Wednesday between Memorial Day and Belmont Stakes Day. |