Feds Tell Court They Can Decide What You Eat

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

hey it works for strippers...

Lol, this is true, but at least they choose, so it can't be construed as cruelty to animals.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Lol, this is true, but at least they choose, so it can't be construed as cruelty to animals.

I'm sure if given the choice, chickens would choose to not get beheaded and fryed. Most strippers are just working thier way through school...

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Have you seen factory farmed chickens?

Their breasts are ridiculously bigger than natural, thanks to the way they're raised.

Yes, that is true. That is why I prefer free-range chicken. It's more expensive but it's much healthier and the animals have a much better life.

[Riot]

These words speak for themselves. There is no way to spin this.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=153133

Well, I think the article spun it alot. What it says in context is that people cannot force the federal government to allow raw milk to be sold across states lines based simply upon the "rights" of some people to want to drink it.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Riot

Well, I think the article spun it alot. What it says in context is that people cannot force the federal government to allow raw milk to be sold across states lines based simply upon the "rights" of some people to want to drink it.

I agree there may be some "spin" in the article. But that still doesn't change the words of the US Attorney. The words are what they are. Maybe the US Attorney shouldn't have made such a broad statement.