Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Charles Hatton Reading Room
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-2010, 06:35 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
Kill a third of the tracks and dates!
Biggest red herring out there. If you eliminate Thistledown, River Downs, Mountaineer, presque isle, etc how does that help Belmont and Santa Anita? it is like saying that if MLB got rid of rookie league and single A leagues, MLB would be more popular. The problem isnt and never has been the size or scope of the sport. On the contrary according to many in this thread the 'exposure' to horseracing leads to a fever that the exposed masses catch which makes them become horseplayers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2010, 06:44 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Biggest red herring out there. If you eliminate Thistledown, River Downs, Mountaineer, presque isle, etc how does that help Belmont and Santa Anita? it is like saying that if MLB got rid of rookie league and single A leagues, MLB would be more popular. The problem isnt and never has been the size or scope of the sport. On the contrary according to many in this thread the 'exposure' to horseracing leads to a fever that the exposed masses catch which makes them become horseplayers.
It makes a huge difference..Maybe not immediately but these horses will ultimately not be raced and the industry will contract to a sustainable level. If each of those tracks have 50 horses that could be raced at a real track that is 300 head racing in a sustainable racing environment. Less trainer, less grooms, less dates, less of everything that shouldnt be.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2010, 06:47 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

More great news from NY.. Apparently by 10/1 the state will choose another slot operator.. LOL and they will open 12 months from that date.. So 10/1/11 slots will be opened for business...SURE

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...ted?source=rss
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2010, 06:51 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
It makes a huge difference..Maybe not immediately but these horses will ultimately not be raced and the industry will contract to a sustainable level. If each of those tracks have 50 horses that could be raced at a real track that is 300 head racing in a sustainable racing environment. Less trainer, less grooms, less dates, less of everything that shouldnt be.
So if lower level horses that you already arent betting on arent raced, higher quality racing will abound? If this were sports and there were 30 teams and you contracted 8 teams then yes the quality of player would increase. But this isnt sports and the vast majority of horses at the low levels would not be competitive at a higher level.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2010, 06:55 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
So if lower level horses that you already arent betting on arent raced, higher quality racing will abound? If this were sports and there were 30 teams and you contracted 8 teams then yes the quality of player would increase. But this isnt sports and the vast majority of horses at the low levels would not be competitive at a higher level.
Chuck there is allowance company at these tracks and they would not be at AP or Bel etc but they would HAVE to be raced in claiming/starter conditions..WHY? because the alternatives need to be closed. Then you wouldnt breed some unraced mare that is from an unraced mare to Say Florida Sandy because its only 1000 bucks

The allowance crap at Thistle could race in conditional 10's at AP? Now the fields are larger at AP and the betting becomes more interesting..AND the bettor has few races to spend the gambling buck
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2010, 07:02 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
Chuck there is allowance company at these tracks and they would not be at AP or Bel etc but they would HAVE to be raced in claiming/starter conditions..WHY? because the alternatives need to be closed. Then you wouldnt breed some unraced mare that is from an unraced mare to Say Florida Sandy because its only 1000 bucks

The allowance crap at Thistle could race in conditional 10's at AP? Now the fields are larger at AP and the betting becomes more interesting..AND the bettor has few races to spend the gambling buck
Ok Freddy here is a question for you? how many of the owners who race horses at these tracks can or are willing to pay $100 a day to run at the top tracks? That is why they are running there. They all have horse vans and condition books are readily available on the internet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2010, 07:31 PM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Ok Freddy here is a question for you? how many of the owners who race horses at these tracks can or are willing to pay $100 a day to run at the top tracks? That is why they are running there. They all have horse vans and condition books are readily available on the internet.
Come on? With less racing purses would increase, handle per race would grow, those owners at Thistle would either be priced out, or some other owner. You would have day rates increase A LOT. You would be racing 10 claimers for 30k all the time not 11k. Racing has to contract, it has to have less of everything including owners that shouldnt be the sport.

Did the inner at Aqueduct really need Hedge Fund(half to Super Saver) racing every 5 days to fill the 7500 whle somewhere there are 20 horses at Turfway that should have been in NY or somewhere substantial help filling the card? And yes if there 12 and 3 on the AE list in a 7500 claimer with only 40 races being run in the country on a wednesday in Feb the Handle and the interest would be very marketable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-11-2010, 07:38 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo View Post
Come on? With less racing purses would increase, handle per race would grow, those owners at Thistle would either be priced out, or some other owner. You would have day rates increase A LOT. You would be racing 10 claimers for 30k all the time not 11k. Racing has to contract, it has to have less of everything including owners that shouldnt be the sport.

Did the inner at Aqueduct really need Hedge Fund(half to Super Saver) racing every 5 days to fill the 7500 whle somewhere there are 20 horses at Turfway that should have been in NY or somewhere substantial help filling the card? And yes if there 12 and 3 on the AE list in a 7500 claimer with only 40 races being run in the country on a wednesday in Feb the Handle and the interest would be very marketable.
The facts are that there is less racing now than there was 20 years ago and it doesnt seem to be helping

http://www.jockeyclub.com/factbook.asp?section=6
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.