Kagan ?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

It was nor her job to impose her views on everyone else. If she thinks that DADT is immoral, that is fine. She is entitled to her opinion. But it was not her place to try to keep the military off campus because of her disapproval of DADT.

Talk about immoral. It was immoral for her to try to restrict access to campus to a group that is entitled by law to have access to the campus.

DADT in my opinion is not only immoral, but unconstitutional. your analagy about being governor and barring clinics doesn't really apply either, since california isn't a private college. i can't say i blame harvard for making it difficult for the military to recruit, considering said military is discriminatory in this respect. it pains me to be critical, as i generally am supportive of my former employer. however, they are out of line on this. i hope it changes soon.

as for kagan-it seems to me that those of the other party than obama are shrilly hollering she's unfit, while feverishly searching for a reason why. if this case is the best they can do, i think she'll be passed with flying colors.

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by Danzig

DADT in my opinion is not only immoral, but unconstitutional. your analagy about being governor and barring clinics doesn't really apply either, since california isn't a private college. i can't say i blame harvard for making it difficult for the military to recruit, considering said military is discriminatory in this respect. it pains me to be critical, as i generally am supportive of my former employer. however, they are out of line on this. i hope it changes soon.

as for kagan-it seems to me that those of the other party than obama are shrilly hollering she's unfit, while feverishly searching for a reason why. if this case is the best they can do, i think she'll be passed with flying colors.

other than having real Americans saying she isn't qualified -
Are there reasons for her to be a Supreme Court Justice?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

other than having real Americans saying she isn't qualified -
Are there reasons for her to be a Supreme Court Justice?

exactly what does your first sentence mean?

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Danzig

DADT in my opinion is not only immoral, but unconstitutional. your analagy about being governor and barring clinics doesn't really apply either, since california isn't a private college. i can't say i blame harvard for making it difficult for the military to recruit, considering said military is discriminatory in this respect. it pains me to be critical, as i generally am supportive of my former employer. however, they are out of line on this. i hope it changes soon.

as for kagan-it seems to me that those of the other party than obama are shrilly hollering she's unfit, while feverishly searching for a reason why. if this case is the best they can do, i think she'll be passed with flying colors.

You say DADT is "immoral and unconstitutional". Many people say the new law in Arizona is "immoral and unconsititutional". People sure love to throw out the line "immoral and unconstitutional" when they disagree with something.

I think banning PG1985 from this board was "immoral and unconstitutional". LOL.

[SOREHOOF]

Trying to transform the USA into a Socialist State like the ones in Europe which are failing is immoral and unconstitutional. Legislating from the bench without the consent of the governed is what this pick is all about. Obama might as well have appointed Oprah. At least people know where she stands on issues.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF

Trying to transform the USA into a Socialist State like the ones in Europe which are failing is immoral and unconstitutional. Legislating from the bench without the consent of the governed is what this pick is all about. Obama might as well have appointed Oprah. At least people know where she stands on issues.

what do you mean by that?

[dellinger63]

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmi...n.html?showall

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmi...n.html?showall

Idiot

[Danzig]

from what little i've read so far about kagan, she seems to be a good choice. they had an article in the paper yesterday, along with a sidebar on some of her comments and thoughts from her appointment process as solicitor general.


and bob, is it dell, the blog author, or both??

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

You say DADT is "immoral and unconstitutional". Many people say the new law in Arizona is "immoral and unconsititutional". People sure love to throw out the line "immoral and unconstitutional" when they disagree with something.

I think banning PG1985 from this board was "immoral and unconstitutional". LOL.

since we operate under the premise that all are created equal, i think i stand on firm ground when i say that DADT is immoral and unconstitutional, since it's blatant discrimination. that's supposed to be something the land of the free doesn't engage in.
as for az, since you're talking about lawbreakers, i don't think it applies.