![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
you're probably right. plus, not having winner take all could cause more issues than it solves. what if there were no candidate that received enough votes? a very real possibility if states split their vote, and didn't have winner take all. then, there's what i thought of earlier this evening. look at the name of our country-not for nothing is it called the united states. no state is supposed to be more powerful than any other-no doubt the main reason there is an electoral college.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |