huck-gay=incest

[letswastemoney]

Chances are slim to none that he'll ever be president now that his quotations are getting attention.

He's too extreme when it comes to gay rights issues to be a factor, even if people agree with his economic plans.

[herkhorse]

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...light=huckabee

yeah, cause all families should look like this

[Nascar1966]

Originally Posted by herkhorse

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...light=huckabee

yeah, cause all families should look like this

That could possibly be John Candy. A shame he died so early when he still had some years left.

[brianwspencer]

And the hilarious part is that in his most recent interview, he tried to call out the journalist for twisting his words...and then they released the full un-edited audio, and it turns out that what he said is exactly what they claimed he did in the first place.

The fact that he hides what's more or less blind hatred behind aw shucks folksy attitudes and then tries to backtrack from his own comments by blaming someone else when they make the news is just awesome.

He sucks...and the idea of him as President, or being in charge of anything terrifies me.

[miraja2]

It wouldn't be so sad if it wasn't for the fact that over 4 million Republican-primary voters actually voted for the guy.

Originally Posted by miraja2

It wouldn't be so sad if it wasn't for the fact that over 4 million Republican-primary voters actually voted for the guy.

Yeah that's scary and sad. 4 million is a huge percentage of the population. Maybe we should kill them or censor them or something.

Jesus christ liberals are natural pu.ssies.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Yeah that's scary and sad. 4 million is a huge percentage of the population. Maybe we should kill them or censor them or something.

Jesus christ liberals are natural pu.ssies.

You took "so sad," and turned it into "Maybe we should kill them or censor them or something." This intentional distortion is not a valid point, or argument of any sort. Once you've distorted the facts, you then turn to distraction ("Jesus christ liberals are natural pu.ssies.") Why can't you simply talk about the subject at hand? Is it because your view is hard to support with an argument? Doesn't hold water?

Was Huck's opinion (on these issues) well known during the Presidential Election?