Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2010, 01:33 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

JUST GO ALREADY!! You got to love it when the hypocrisy is this thick. He's saying it doesn't work. Well, he didn't work. If scumbags like him had been loyal (instead of lookin' out for his own white-bread ass) then we wouldn't be where we are. There's 5 or 6 of you parasites that just had to show your white ass off n' fk everything up. Vamoose Papoose. Give me 52 DEMS that aren't out to stab their own party's President in the back (just to see how many INDEPENDENT power points they can gather up.) Traitors are human waste. They should of been made to pay. They still should be made to pay.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2010, 01:52 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
JUST GO ALREADY!! You got to love it when the hypocrisy is this thick. He's saying it doesn't work. Well, he didn't work. If scumbags like him had been loyal (instead of lookin' out for his own white-bread ass) then we wouldn't be where we are. There's 5 or 6 of you parasites that just had to show your white ass off n' fk everything up. Vamoose Papoose. Give me 52 DEMS that aren't out to stab their own party's President in the back (just to see how many INDEPENDENT power points they can gather up.) Traitors are human waste. They should of been made to pay. They still should be made to pay.
So you feel people should vote strictly on Party lines?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2010, 02:14 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32
So you feel people should vote strictly on Party lines?
On Filibuster? Yes. They could of voted no on the bill. They needed 60 to kill a Filibuster. Just majority for the bill. They should be punished for ever not supporting him on at least killing a Filibuster. No respect. They need a lesson. They need a painful lesson. These traitors are a pack of vermin. You need to punish vermin. I had a sink that my washer drains into. A lil baby rat somehow got into that sink , n' couldn't get out. I did not waiver. I simply let the washer drain properly into the sink. Vermin is vermin.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2010, 03:05 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
On Filibuster? Yes. They could of voted no on the bill. They needed 60 to kill a Filibuster. Just majority for the bill. They should be punished for ever not supporting him on at least killing a Filibuster. No respect. They need a lesson. They need a painful lesson. These traitors are a pack of vermin. You need to punish vermin. I had a sink that my washer drains into. A lil baby rat somehow got into that sink , n' couldn't get out. I did not waiver. I simply let the washer drain properly into the sink. Vermin is vermin.
the likely replacement for bayh as nominee is a pro-gun, anti-abortion democrat. and the republican dan coates is even more conservative.

evan bayh had to represent his constituents in indiana, not someone elses in san francisco.

the problem with the progressive arguement that what's lacking is party discipline is the utter failure to notice that despite the election of obama this is still a center-right country. you can "punish" all the evan bayh's and ben nelson's you want. it won't help move a purely progressive agenda through congress.

i'd leave it up to to the republicans to purify their party.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2010, 03:18 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hi_im_god
the likely replacement for bayh as nominee is a pro-gun, anti-abortion democrat. and the republican dan coates is even more conservative.

evan bayh had to represent his constituents in indiana, not someone elses in san francisco.

the problem with the progressive arguement that what's lacking is party discipline is the utter failure to notice that despite the election of obama this is still a center-right country. you can "punish" all the evan bayh's and ben nelson's you want. it won't help move a purely progressive agenda through congress.

i'd leave it up to to the republicans to purify their party.
If a Dem Senator won't back a Dem President in a Filibuster vote, then they are totally useless.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2010, 05:22 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

which party is doing the purifying? while a pro-choice moderate gets elected as a Republican (Scott Brown), a Democratic moderate (Bayh) throws in the towel because its just too partisan. boo-hoo.

Frankly I think its good for the country if many of these guys from both parties either retire or get beat. My theme is start over fresh with younger people. McCain is one who I think should step aside. I mean at 74 do you really need to be running for a fresh six year term in the senate?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-17-2010, 06:17 AM
AeWingnut's Avatar
AeWingnut AeWingnut is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
If a Dem Senator won't back a Dem President in a Filibuster vote, then they are totally useless.

maybe just maybe some prefer to put the country ahead of the party
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-17-2010, 07:04 PM
SCUDSBROTHER's Avatar
SCUDSBROTHER SCUDSBROTHER is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 11,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeWingnut
maybe just maybe some prefer to put the country ahead of the party
They should've threatened to vote against the bill, but not the Filibuster. You don't vote against your party's President on a Filibuster vote. Any Democrat who threatened to do so should be laying on a slab. Have to say that Howard Dean is 100% right about the party (not tough enough.) They aren't doing anything for the country, they are just attention-seeking opportunistic parasites. That is especially true about Lieberman, Mary L., and Nelson. Blanche is a Moderate Republican in the wrong party. Bayh has no personal ideology whatsoever. I'll tell ya why he left. He was gunna have to attack the President (to keep his seat.) That's against his nature. His nature is to be for what 60% of the people are for, and against what 60% of people are against. In other words, he's useless as old gum.

Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 02-17-2010 at 07:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-18-2010, 03:53 PM
Patrick333 Patrick333 is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 1,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
If a Dem Senator won't back a Dem President in a Filibuster vote, then they are totally useless.
Even if they disagree with him?
__________________
The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely the one who dropped it - Lou Holtz
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.