Super Bowl 2011 Early Line

[declansharbor]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

no offense but the only thing he's right about is the Eagles. There is no reason for them to have the same odds as a team that absolutely destroyed them two weeks in a row.

and Romo > McNabb. If McNabb plays next year it will be a typical year for the Eagles. McNabb will have 6 awesome games and 6 average games and 4 poor games (against teams like Oakland) and we'll go 10-6 or 11-5 and then we'll look awesome the first playoff game or so and McChoke will do his thing when it matters (choke).

You could've said the same thing after the Eagles buttfu cked the Cowgirls in week 17 of the prior year, but look how than turned out...Things can go either way, especially in this division. We will bounce back once we turn the defense upside down. With a few team's high draft picks this year, we'd be fools to look in any direction other than shoring up the defense. Andy knows this, he better, and will adjust in the off-season accordingly.


and let's blame it ALL on McNabb. Granted, they had a cupcake schedule, but they did set many offensive records for the franchise. They looked like dog $hit the last few weeks of the year, but that can be attributed to much, much more than just 'McChoke'... and Romo is NOT> McNabb, lets be real Uncly...I'll need Romo to win more than one playoff game for your assessment to hold ANY weight.

and for the blind as a bat USC knob gobbler, good ole Pete Carrol will be back in college ball in two years. I'd much rather be a Reid fan that swinging from the cock of a guy who failed MISERABLY in his stint as a pro coach and primed to fail again. Is Reid the best gameday coach? Not by any stretch, but he sure as $hit will, on his worst day, run a much better operation (organization, not family) than Carrol will on his best day.