Thorn Song confusion furthers Zayat intrigue

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by prudery

No I am not confused NOR do I not comprehend that it does logically seem impossible to pay a mortality check on a live horse ...

BUT--I viewed the actual check as per KY.com and it does indeed say MORTALITY claim on Thorn Song ( less deduction ) ...

So THEY called it as such, paid out as such, and though I am not in the biz, I assume that is how they did it considering that the horse was a total ...

And they knew the horse was not dead---see for yourself ...

When I said check in my original post, I meant THAT particular check--not all mortality checks of course ..

I do ubnderstand LOU, and I do understand what mortality means ..

That would not happen with my company, We dont pay mortality on horses that are alive. We must see a necropsy. Euthanasia must been recommended by a Company Approved Vet, etc. We also dont offer LOU on race horses.

maybe the check was written as mortality and wasnt paid as mortality. Also, why is Zayats check posted on a website?? that makes no sense and I dont think I'd believe it even if I saw it.. I just went to ky.com and it was for KY Jelly.