![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't say it was an anti-conservative, anti-GOP trend. I said it was as split vote between the GOP candidate and the Teabagger, resulting in the Dem win. Quote:
No, I think there was a great voter turnout (the numbers speak for themselves) and the candidate that ran the best campaign won, and deserved it. He ran against a candidate that did nothing, insulted her electorate, and got what she deserved.Quote:
There was a great voter turnout, and Kennedy was indeed an "icon", not just "the Dem that filled the seat", and I think the election proved it about him - why should the people he represented, who were very close to him, who he knew intimately, voted for him year after year, vote for a candidate that was nothing like him at all, who didn't respect the voters as he did? The voters voted for Kennedy. Not "the Dem".Quote:
Quote:
Seriously - can you not post counter-arguments that are based primarily on your assumptions? Maybe check things out first. Quote:
Huh? Geeshus, Chuck, seriously, if you get that from what I wrote, you need a reading comprehension class.No, Chuck - the Dem was the Dem - most obviously - he was the Republican, but he courted Independents (of which a great majority in Mass classify themselves as, not Dems) by not calling himself a Republican, and he courted the far right by calling himself "Voter 41" (he signed his autographs "Scott Brown 41") against healthcare.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |