![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Bush is mentioned and brought up, as the people who are attacking Obama regarding his response to Crotchbomber are Republican, and completely hypocritical to not recall how Bush, in the exact same situation, did nothing. No press release, to discussion at all for a week, then only casually in passing. And that was pretty much it. Okay, fine - let's just discuss what Obama has done. The day it happened, his office issued comment. For after that, I"ll quote Steve Benen: Quote:
![]() Regarding fillibustering: look at the numbers of legislative fillibusters in the past. It's gone way up. The use of it has changed. It used to be used only for important differences in major legislation. The Dems have the votes, far more than enough majority, and our Senate works by majority rule. But the GOP are fillibustering virtually everything, forcing cloture votes for the simplist of measures to pass. That's absurd. For no other purpose than delay, obstruction and to make Obama look bad - which they have admitted in public, too. There's talk about Reid should be forcing the GOP to actually fillibuster in person (not just notify the threat) and cause them to be present on C-span, standing at the podium, so the public can watch who is actually obstructing the progress of government here. They are discussing doing that rather than changing the fillibuster rules. If the GOP wanted to vote no on everything, they just should have voted no and stood on their principles. Not fillibuster, delay, obstruct every darn thing in an attempt to circumvent the Constitution. Not put their party and their politics above country.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |