|
|
 |
|
|
|
#2
01-06-2010, 01:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever." hi im god quote 
|
|
#3
01-06-2010, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
01-06-2010, 02:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i wasn't talking about the team , i was talking just about the "d" bob i watched the whole pittsburgh game 2 weeks ago , is that really a championship d? rogers can carry them for a couple of wins no question about it , but , is the "d" really good eneough to take them all the way ....that is what i am talking about
|
|
#5
01-06-2010, 02:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Saints- Arguebly the best team, but haven't looked like worldbeaters the last few weeks. Vikings- Dangerous team who is a lot better at home and would have to beat the Pack for a third time (didn't work out so well for Dallas a few years ago). Cards- High powered offense that did beat the Vikings. But you talk about schedules, they didn't exactly beat a cast of world beaters. But probably gained some valueable experience last year. Cowboys- Dr. Jeckell - Mr. Hyde. They could either be lights out or just God awful. Never know what you are going to get. Eagles- A team with defensive trouble. Plus people are jumping off the bandwagon quick after last weeks debacle.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
|
|
#6
01-06-2010, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'll tell you this matt , the 2 nfc winners this week whomever they are can all knock off the saints and vikings i agree the nfc is wide open i'm not sold on the packer d , but, as i said rogers can carry them a couple of games , i don't think they can win 3 in a row on the road imo against playoff teams as far rematches , the cowboys get the eagles for a 3rd time this yr. it is very hard to beat a team 3 times as the cowboys know from 2 yrs ago when they had a bye and waited for the giants to come to them for game 3 ....we know what happened i think big d benefits here as they play right away , i also think big d has the better d and as long as romo does not implode they should win 2 yrs ago i thought the 7 pt underdog giants had a chance becuase i never got the feeling that dallas was that much better than them in either game during the regular season , if i remember right the 1st game was in big d and it was a shootout and game 2 at the meadowlands was close until TO got free for one late. Watching both philly games this year , i just don't see the philly o being able to do much against the cowboys d ......they will need help from their d to create scoring opportunites
|
|
#7
01-06-2010, 02:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!"
|
|
#8
01-06-2010, 02:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i agree with that and never said they couldn't win a couple that way my original comment said that their d was not good and i stanby that no matter what the numbers say .....they looked like swiss cheese against big ben a few wks ago
|
|
#9
01-06-2010, 02:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Even when Warner and the rest of the offense is back in full, GB is not a team that matches well for them. Only allowed 185 to Baltimore.
__________________
"I don't feel like that I am any better than anybody else" - Paul Newman
|
|
#10
01-06-2010, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef
|
|
#11
01-10-2010, 10:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
01-11-2010, 07:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Starting DBs for GB mid season: Woodson Harris Collins Blackmon Bigby Lee Left from that group yesterday: Woodson Collins Eveyone else lost to injury during season or during game. They will be fine...get healthy and add a few bodies next year. Great run from a team not many expected much from this year installing a new Defensive scheme
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever." hi im god quote
|
|
#13
01-11-2010, 08:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
as i said to billy and you can ask , unless they (the front the dl) could get to warner they would be in big trouble , it didn't matter who was back there , the only way to beat the cardinals besides outscroring them is to hit warner early and oftern with your dl , the lack of pass rush from the dl is also a major hole come playoff time - you gotta get to the qb correct me if i am wrong but no one mentioned these injuries until you did this am bob , everyone told me the packer d would be fine because they were playing well at the end of the season , my rebutall was the pittsburgh game exposed them and i was told it's just 1 game i gave them credit for the big d game and for the balt game , but outside of those games the D really hadn't done much all year against quality opponents as good as rodgers and the offense was , the D forced 1 , count it bob , 1 punt all day .....1 punt each time the offense rallied the D had a chance - at 17-7 they let warner go right down the field for 24-7 after halftime , warner goes right down the field 31-10 after the onside kick recovery and ensuing td make it 31-24 , warner goes right back to work and makes it 38-24 next, the d get 1 stop and thus rodges is able to tie the game at 38 win the game now green bay d , not what happens .....warner chews right through the d to go back up 45-38 rodgers with one of the best performances ever by a qb win or lose ties the game agian on the next drive , it's a total disaster , do anything you can to force ot , instead the D gets bailed out by a neil rackers miss at the buzzer bob they have a long way to go
|
Hybrid Mode
