|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
11-02-2009, 05:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
#2
11-02-2009, 07:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 I guess not, Sanchez made the list.But really, the KG may be correct that Nicks will be the best player going forward but to this point Harvin's production and contribution towers over him. I understand that Hicks was banged up and didn't start but that's not the other WR's fault.
|
|
#3
11-02-2009, 07:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020) Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine
|
|
#4
11-02-2009, 10:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
These are Mike Wallace's stats: 21 catchs for 368 yds 17.5 per catch 2 TD's He was the 4th reciever for the first couple games of the season. He as yet to start a game and plays maybe half the snaps. So has Mike Wallace been better than Nicks?
|
|
#5
11-03-2009, 06:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Absolutely. And look at where the catches came. They were important plays in the middle of tight games as opposed to garbage time stats in blow outs. I think at the end of the day thats the point. Not just that Harvin has made more plays but that the plays he made actually MATTERED.
|
|
#6
11-03-2009, 03:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Still no sign of Nicks on the Scouts inc rookie list
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4618971
|
|
#7
11-03-2009, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
11-02-2009, 10:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
