9/30: Belmont & Santa Anita (6th-9th)

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by pointman

As Andy Serling pointed out on Talking Horses today, the majority of those horses were likely stakes horses (though he didn't have the stats). The stat gave cause for pause, but on paper the Mott looked to be the class of this field and tough to beat here particularly with the addition of Lasix. Not sure why I wasted money using the 1 and 5 here in the pk4, particularly the 5 who was meeting a tough field for her first try against winners.

11 of them were allowance races and two of the wins came in those, so I guess that helped the overall percentage a bit more.

I liked Gran Appeal and am 1000% confident if you reverse their trips GA wins by a few lengths.

NT

[pointman]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

11 of them were allowance races and two of the wins came in those, so I guess that helped the overall percentage a bit more.

I liked Gran Appeal and am 1000% confident if you reverse their trips GA wins by a few lengths.

NT

Thanks for info. I did not get to watch the races today, but I really should have just went 3,4 there. Oh well, there is always tomorrow!

I'm not listening to the show but I imagine Steve is on TILT.

[Kasept]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

I'm not listening to the show but I imagine Steve is on TILT.

That... was brutal.

But I at least knew it when they hit the wire. That Saintly Seoul ran big too at 50-1.