![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Chuck, I'm not saying he's anything but a liberal. I also am well aware that my ideal candidate, and my ideal set of policies that I would love to see in place in this country will NEVER EVER happen.
It's the fact that they're pathetic and spineless. Bush and his people didn't have any problem going it alone (look! there's something about Bush that I actually admire, his strength of conviction....even if they were totally wrong), but regardless of how Obama campaigned, in nine short months, it's become abundantly clear that nobody is willing to meet him in the middle or anywhere near the middle. So the options are either go it alone and take ownership of what you stand for, or keep talking empty talk about working together with a group of people with NO interest whatsoever in working with you on anything but what they want and who are completely controlled by out of control teabaggers and birthers. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really think some kind of health care reform is going to pass. This country really needs it. Affordable health care for all Americans is just the morally right thing to do. the govn't option sucks because we all know that the government royally screws up anything they stick their nose into. What really bugs me is the dems insistance about not reforming the malpractice bulljive. They cant offend those few thousand lawyers that pad their pockets. Sure they say they are doing this or that.. but there is no real interest on the Dems side to reform malpractice sheisa. If they put more effort into that I could see some Repubs getting on board.
And the reason Obama wants bipartisan support is because when his policies fail miserably, like the stimulus, he wants to be able to share the blame.
__________________
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
the best thing they could do to help out health care would be the one thing they absolutely won't do-tort reform. because, when it's all said and done, the pols will do what's best for themselves, not the rest of us. and tort reform would definitely not be best for the pols.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
That was weeks ago - you guys don't pay attention?
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
lol asking and getting are waaaaaay different. you really think dems are going to bite that hand? lol ain't gonna happen. lawyers are some of the biggest contributors to the democratic party, and certainly would never want anything close to tort reform.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you knew how to read you would have read where they did some bullshit with the tort reform.. but its really weak. I dont want to argue with you though as you are clueless.
__________________
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Name the Senator:
Quote:
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Even if we have Tort Reform, most likely Doctors and insurance companies will just find a way to pocket the savings. If one pig at the trough goes away, the others just eat his share. You really think, if they set up these panels (or boards) to bypass lawyers, that Insurance companies n' Doctors won't find away to buy them off? These are two smart pigs. If you do this, then you better come up with a system that recognizes this. You think it's easy to get patients what they are due without pigs fighting other pigs to get it? Don't be naive. There are three pigs at the trough. Get rid of one of them, and (of course) the other two eat his share. The only way this won't happen is with some very strong mechanism that can't be manipulated by these other two.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Exactly.. I read the same thing. I know Riots response though. "look at who wrote that. republican propaganda blah blah blah" then she'll say how she's a republican and Obama is not a liberal. She gives liberals a bad name.
__________________
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 09-30-2009 at 10:07 PM. |