OMG

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

gimme a break, this family values charge is such a disingenuous argument. show me the list of democrats who proclaim that they are against family values. when democrats run for office, do they not project themselves as fine ,upstanding, moral people? or do they proudly go on the record as supporting marital infidelity, or at least being indifferent to it? show me the democrats that say that Sanfords actions are no big deal. if you can't then it means that democrats also view marital fidelity as something important, and therefore both parties are in favor of family values, and let's not forget the many democrats who have failed in this regard as well, some in a spectacular fashion.

i'd agree democrats should be very careful about making too big an issue of human nature (which is all that sex in all it's wonderful and weird forms is).

but it's a patently lame argument that those who have made "thou shalt not" part of their platform don't have further to fall when they're caught doing what comes naturally.

it's not the act. it the hypocrisy.

Republican men desire melons as much as Democrats.

The Fine Governor from South Carolina referred
to the Argentinian Ladies orbs by email. He liked it
when she held them apparently. I guess when he
was not involved with them, she was. I guess they
were popular with both parties.

Antitrust is salivating.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by pgardn

Republican men desire melons as much as Democrats.

The Fine Governor from South Carolina referred
to the Argentinian Ladies orbs by email. He liked it
when she held them apparently. I guess when he
was not involved with them, she was. I guess they
were popular with both parties.

Antitrust is salivating.