Obama wrong yet again

[notyep59]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Maybe you should. A few threads about clowns would be much more entertaining than you trying to censor another poster because he's making threads in a subforum named POLITICS/SOCIETY.

I'm not trying to censor anybody, coach, just putting my opinion out there like you do. I'm almost certain I've seen you have differing opinions on here with others but you don't call your responses censoring, just humorous, like i was basically trying to do. Keep up the good work, I'll still be a fan.

Fair enough.

I'm interested to see what's going to happen in 2012 if Obama keeps p.issing on Israel and taking bukkake shots to the face from Iran. I have a feeling by that time he will f.uck things up so bad that Colin Powell will run against him and win.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

Fair enough.

I'm interested to see what's going to happen in 2012 if Obama keeps p.issing on Israel and taking bukkake shots to the face from Iran. I have a feeling by that time he will f.uck things up so bad that Colin Powell will run against him and win.

If Obama gets his cap and trade policy through... which I keep getting letters from my electric company saying that if this passes to expect my bill to rise by AT LEAST $50 per month (extra $600 per year). I say there is absolutely no way he is re-elected.

I also dont think that politicions are dumb enough (even the democrats) to pass this bill knowing it will SEVERLY hurt their chances for re-election.

Americans may not be smart enough to understand 90% of what goes on in this world, but they are smart enough to recognize a $50 TAX from the government in their electric bill every month.

[gales0678]

it all comes down to guns + butter lori , you're right , if taxes get out of hand he won't win re-election

[dellinger63]

and the great 'oralter' we be heard again. "It's the economy stupid"

Cap and Trade will not only affect your electric bill but almost everything you buy as when manufacturers are hit with the tax they will have no choice but to pass it on down. sans products manufactured in foreign countries who don't have the tax. Let's see how that works out.

[gales0678]

the bush tax cuts expire at then end of 2010

if we are still in a recession / no growth era , do you think it makes sense to not at least extend them for another year , do you really want taxes to go up in a non growing economy?

[dalakhani]

You guys are hilarious. Obama, for better or worse, is like teflon. I thought this would be a one term presidency but in order to beat a sitting president you have to have a decent candidate with which to beat him regardless of the performance of said president. See George W. Bush 2004.

The republican party needs to take a long look in the mirror and regroup for a run in 2016. Perhaps by then they can come up with a viable candidate. The idea that there are still people in the party that have hopes of trotting out a marginalized Sarah Palin in 2012 shows the sad state of affairs.

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

You guys are hilarious. Obama, for better or worse, is like teflon. I thought this would be a one term presidency but in order to beat a sitting president you have to have a decent candidate with which to beat him regardless of the performance of said president. See George W. Bush 2004.

The republican party needs to take a long look in the mirror and regroup for a run in 2016. Perhaps by then they can come up with a viable candidate. The idea that there are still people in the party that have hopes of trotting out a marginalized Sarah Palin in 2012 shows the sad state of affairs.

i always thought Hillary's biggest mistake was not running for president in '04

Bush was beatable and she could have gotten him that year considering that Kerry was right there against GW.

There's no doubt in mind that if Hillary had beaten Obama she would have been president

The Clinton's guessed wrong by not going for the jugular in '04

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

You guys are hilarious. Obama, for better or worse, is like teflon. I thought this would be a one term presidency but in order to beat a sitting president you have to have a decent candidate with which to beat him regardless of the performance of said president. See George W. Bush 2004.

The republican party needs to take a long look in the mirror and regroup for a run in 2016. Perhaps by then they can come up with a viable candidate. The idea that there are still people in the party that have hopes of trotting out a marginalized Sarah Palin in 2012 shows the sad state of affairs.

i don't agree with this , Obama in 2005 would have been 1000/1 to win the presidencey , therefore someone can still win from the republican party in 2012 - theremaybe someone out there how comes in from the back of the pack like MTB did in the derby an leaves everybody stunned ...... who bet on Obama to win in '05 ,06, +07 - it was all Hillary Clinton , she was even money to win the nomination for a long time