|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
03-05-2009, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You do it for enjoyment? I do it because I love the pain of running 2nd all the f'n time 
|
|
#2
03-05-2009, 03:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Please.. sometimes your horse finishes 4th (in a 2 horse race).
|
|
#4
03-05-2009, 06:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No one has mentioned this, but since Aqueduct is the focus of the conversation, has it occured to anyone that the "Serling Effect" could be at work on the multi-race wagers? Any number of players that are simply stringing Andy's horses in P3/P4 sequences could be skewing returns.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
|
|
#5
03-05-2009, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
 Quote:
that is correct steve , if 1 used his horses , you would have hit both p 4's i know what happened , the guys who hit the early p4 were so elated , they cashed out , headed back to the city , made a dinner reservation and invited andy out as a thank you for him giving out so many winners, they realized they forgot to put in the late p4 but they didn't care as the early one paid telephone #s i can see the gang there now , at Del Frisco's , they have just finished the seafood appitzer that goes for a samll fortune , the steaks are on their way out , and the waitress from Alaska , who is simply breath -taking , is pouring the red wine with a big smile on her face ,asking for the winner of saturday's gotham , and she pleads come on guys everyone has to eat once and a while
|
|
#6
03-05-2009, 07:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
03-05-2009, 08:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
only the ones that bet today. But he needs to develop a code or audible IMO.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson
|
|
#8
03-06-2009, 09:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The only way a win parlay is a true reflection of the pay out is if you make a straight p3 or pk4 bet. Most pk3s and 4s are wheels and every time you hit a win bet the winnings have to be split up between the horses in the next leg. Comparing the payoffs to a win parlay isnot very objective. If you had a winning ticket on any of these races . The true $2 pay out caan be calculated but a straight $2 parlay is not accurate.
|
|
#9
03-06-2009, 09:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ummmm......no.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
|
|
#10
03-06-2009, 10:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When I was at Toga, I was messing around with the win parlay cards and unless I am mistaken, that was exactly how it was done.
|
|
#11
03-06-2009, 10:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The only reason the parlay is slightly debatable is that perhaps the amount you wager on a horse could affect the odds. Your spread play plays no role in calculating parlays.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB
|
|
#13
03-05-2009, 06:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd believe the Serling effect would be the exact opposite of the GPK effect, i.e., folks run from GPK's picks like rats from a sinking ship.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
|
|
#14
03-05-2009, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
 Hello to you too John
|
|
#15
03-05-2009, 06:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
