Is the current Pope a disgrace to the Cathloic Church

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

I say it's gone far enough to see him befriending pedophiles and,now, Nazi sympathizers.





Sorry about the misspelling of Catholic, I can't seem to go back and edit it

As a Catholic I find this completely offensive. Where is your proof that he is befriending pedophiles? Making him responsible for every action taken by a priest is completely wrong. And to get the facts straight read this:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/pop...025223422.html

[Mike]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

As a Catholic I find this completely offensive. Where is your proof that he is befriending pedophiles? Making him responsible for every action taken by a priest is completely wrong. And to get the facts straight read this:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/pop...025223422.html

I'm going to stock my ammo, dellinger, it may take a while.

I'm a Catholic, too.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

I'm going to stock my ammo, dellinger, it may take a while.

I'm a Catholic, too.

Go at it. GL
aren't the vast majority of Priest Pedophile targets boys? Would be as ignorant as me thinking all Gays are Pedophiles.

[Mike]

You know, dellinger, it's going to be pretty easy to show the links revealing the Blagojevich side of this current Pope.


I do think their are still many who think the Pope is not subject to scrutiny, that the Pope is somehow channeling Gods' will, thus criticism would be blasphemous

How do you feel about this statement?

[Mike]

Nice article on calls from within the Catholic church for the Pope to resign:
http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-en...ilitation.html

Here's a few excerpts:

Theologian Hermann Haering went so far as to say that the Pope should resign: “If the Pope wants to do something good for the church, he should step down.”


But Vatican spokesman, Reverend Federico Lombardi, told AP that the Pope’s “absolutely indefensible” decision to reinstate Williamson did not reflect the Vatican’s views: “They are his personal ideas ... that we certainly don't share”

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

You know, dellinger, it's going to be pretty easy to show the links revealing the Blagojevich side of this current Pope.


[I]I do think their are still many who think the Pope is not subject to scrutiny, that the Pope is somehow channeling Gods' will, thus criticism would be blasphemous[/i]

How do you feel about this statement?

Blago? WTF? I was never taught the Pope was channeling anything from God unless he is blessing bread and wine so the question makes no sense to me.

[Mike]

Why is it you come to this guys defense? I see no reason, in our modern world, to bestow any special reverence on a pope or a priest. I think you're holding him on a higher pedestal. I think he's a man, good and bad, no different than anyone, not picked in any way by God


Do you really get a good feeling from this Pope?

[Mike]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/menach..._b_163832.html


An excerpt:
"has no purpose but to inculcate contempt for Jews. According to deniers Jews use the Holocaust to win the world's sympathy and, in the course of so doing, win reparations from Germany and political support for Israel. Such a charge, based as it is the imagery of money and political manipulation, hearkens back to traditional antisemitic stereotypes. Why a pope would want to give support to such a movement is baffling. More baffling, however, is why a pope would want to associate the Vatican with someone who preaches lies and manipulations of history."

[dellinger63]

Listen he is not buddying up with this moron priest from England. He said he wants to rehablitate him which I feel means he wants to educate him on the facts. The Pope does not judge, God does. What do you want him to do? Send the Papal Guard to assasinate him? But keep at it......

[Mike]

And here a succinct link to the pedophilia stuff:
http://endtimeswisdom.blogspot.com/2...edophiles.html

From ABC news: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4656143&page=1

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

Why is it you come to this guys defense? I see no reason, in our modern world, to bestow any special reverence on a pope or a priest. I think you're holding him on a higher pedestal. I think he's a man, good and bad, no different than anyone, not picked in any way by God


Do you really get a good feeling from this Pope?

I am in no position to read his mind but still I have faith in both him and ultimately in the Church. I have known many Priests (majority of who were Jesuits) who are completely selfless and are more powerful than the average man simply because of their faith. They walk the talk and every facit of what they do is service to mankind. Goes with the motto "Man for Others" drilled into us during the four years of bootcamp known as Loyola Academy.

[Mike]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

As a Catholic I find this completely offensive. Where is your proof that he is befriending pedophiles? Making him responsible for every action taken by a priest is completely wrong. And to get the facts straight read this:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/pop...025223422.html

Hell, I just read your counter-argument article and it sucks. The Pope takes no responsibility for anything, tells us to believe what he now says, not what he's done: says it has caused "great suffering to the church" putting the church's interests ahead of the individuals, and he says he has a difficult time understanding how this all came about.

Yet he wrote and enforced the policy of cover up and silence, and letting the pedophile continue on.

Sick f.u.c.k.s

Dellinger, I challenge you to find me a link to a web site anymore perverted than this crew

[Mike]

On Dellinger's Sydney Morning Herald source, from Wikipedia:

Historically, the SMH has been a conservative newspaper as evidenced by the fact that it did not endorse the Australian Labor Party at any election until 1984 or at a state election until 2003. Its parent company, Fairfax, is chaired by a high-profile former member of the Liberal party, Ron Walker.

The Sydney Morning Herald is historically credited with high standards of journalism; however, in recent years it has been accused of "dumbing down" editorial content, with more space allocated to larger photographs and lifestyle-based stories.[1]

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

On Dellinger's Sydney Morning Herald source, from Wikipedia:

Historically, the SMH has been a conservative newspaper as evidenced by the fact that it did not endorse the Australian Labor Party at any election until 1984 or at a state election until 2003. Its parent company, Fairfax, is chaired by a high-profile former member of the Liberal party, Ron Walker.

The Sydney Morning Herald is historically credited with high standards of journalism; however, in recent years it has been accused of "dumbing down" editorial content, with more space allocated to larger photographs and lifestyle-based stories.[1]

and your point is? You used the End Times who states Canada, Mexico and the U.S. are conspirators with 'the trialateral commission and the council of foreign relations' to form a new country forsaking the constitution and the Sovereignty of the US. Now that's one hell of a source!!!!

[Mike]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

and your point is? You used the End Times who states Canada, Mexico and the U.S. are conspirators with 'the trialateral commission and the council of foreign relations' to form a new country forsaking the constitution and the Sovereignty of the US. Now that's one hell of a source!!!!

I threw that referenced link out, dellinger, I didn't need it. Watch the BBC documentary, if you take issue, tell me. I've backed down and admitted I was in the wrong more than once before on this forum

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

I threw that referenced link out, dellinger, I didn't need it. Watch the BBC documentary, if you take issue, tell me. I've backed down and admitted I was in the wrong more than once before on this forum

I can't watch it because I have a different media player and I could care less whether you admit your wrong or right. Damning a Pope and wishing him to hell was quite enough for me. Can't change ignorance or stupidity for that matter. I suspect you are very young or at least that is my hope.

[Mike]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I can't watch it because I have a different media player and I could care less whether you admit your wrong or right. Damning a Pope and wishing him to hell was quite enough for me. Can't change ignorance or stupidity for that matter. I suspect you are very young or at least that is my hope.

I'm 46 years old, studied some religion in college with a southern Baptist gay minister(Harvard educated and excellent)


There's a good documentary film, it's on Comcast cable television On Demand as a free movie often, called Capturing the Friedmans. It's home footage taken by a teenage son of a married man with family who is accused of child molestation as a private piano tutor. The kids back up dad, but the wife goes against him early. Great film into what a pedophile may look like to the outside world

[Mike]

It's NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association. It's a group tha t tries to justify, through rational argument, that it's okay for men to be a sexual mentor to a young boy. Guess it goes back to the days of Plato, the foundation of our modern thought


Was given last rites by Catholic priest at about 3 weeks old, had baptism and First Holy Communion, but not confirmation. Spent grades 1-4 in a Roman Catholic school taught by nuns.

Felt at an early age that the nuns were hypocrites

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

It's NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association. It's a group tha t tries to justify, through rational argument, that it's okay for men to be a sexual mentor to a young boy. Guess it goes back to the days of Plato, the foundation of our modern thought

Was given last rites by Catholic priest at about 3 weeks old, had baptism and First Holy Communion, but not confirmation. Spent grades 1-4 in a Roman Catholic school taught by nuns.

Felt at an early age that the nuns were hypocrites

yea the foundation of modern thought. I'm sorry you were sexually abused. Get help. Life is to short to go thru it hating.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Mike

Hell, I just read your counter-argument article and it sucks. The Pope takes no responsibility for anything, tells us to believe what he now says, not what he's done: says it has caused "great suffering to the church" putting the church's interests ahead of the individuals, and he says he has a difficult time understanding how this all came about.

Yet he wrote and enforced the policy of cover up and silence, and letting the pedophile continue on.

Sick f.u.c.k.s

Dellinger, I challenge you to find me a link to a web site anymore perverted than this crew

MANBLA

Checkmate