![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
are making me dizzy. I think I'm gonna puke.
Spudder
__________________
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Absolutely horrible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
yeah i just posted the same thing on another thread.
too many rapid cuts. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Race 2 from Belmont had 17 "Takes"(changes of cameras) for the race. 13 of them were before they turned for home. When Durkin screams that a horse checked into the turn you never saw it. Morons found a way to ruin the coverage. Move over, I am puking too. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agree - they need to cut the artsy ****.....just show the track feed and then give me the cute stuff on the replays...
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Always keep your heads up and act like champions." Coach Paul Bryant |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
is this why TVG and HRTV aren't showing the races.. so ESPN can
"lets bring in the XFL cam" I'll just watch it on the internet what a bunch of idiots always going to non-horse racing people to promote the sport
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
one second you're looking at the pan view, then a quick cut to the view from space, then they are heading right at you, next the moving truck shot for about 3 seconds. makes your head spin. they have the right ingredients but they need a director that knows how to watch races. they should have one live race structure, and then a different one for replays.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm hoping they show Big Brown bucking in the stall during the far turn of the 3rd. Maybe show P. Diddy posing like a douchebag at the sixteenth pole.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
hopefully they don't go spastic like this with the belmont.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Remember that ESPN is not here to present a simulcast feed. They are here for entertainment. Anyone outside of our horse racing circle enjoys the cool angles, cuts and unique perspectives.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yep, give a 14 to 23 year old a video recording device these days, and they'll likely produced similarly flavored work. For whatever reason, that's the preferred style at the moment, and has been for a few years.... |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Way to foucus on a run away winner guys, Nobody cares about battles for 2nd and 3rd!
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
My mind is exploding.
And I see an industry guy is defending this debacle. Shocking. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe it's just our ignorance to what others think of the game? Or what they're looking for?
I haven't seen a race yet, so let me toss that in here, however, this dying need for the typical pan shot by racing fans on ESPN is lame. How about this -- no viewers -- no ESPN -- then how would we feel? There would be no camera angles to show. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I just know that a friend of mine who has a brother not at all interested in racing made comments about how he could get into it more with the cool camera angles they showed for Dubai's racing coverage. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
I actually wasn't having a problem with it until they allowed a drunken 5 year old hold the camera during that winner's circle photo op. One word...Steadycam.
Oh wait did I say drunken 5 year old? I meant Hank Goldberg. |