July 2 Churchill Downs ROI Wagers go here . . .

[RUFFIAN]

( DON )
“… this was put into the rules some time ago.”

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=====

Having been here So long
Never felt a need
To Go Back + Re-read Rules

Somehow I thought using ALL RACRS IN ROI
APPLIED ONLY TO TC + BC Days

So Thanks for the Info
As I may have a Horse in last race

[Real Quiet]

Well it can't be Greatheart.

[Real Quiet]

Race 7 $11 ex key 5 w 4-7-11

Race 9 $11 ex key 3 w 4-6-7

Race 11 $11 ex key 4 w 8-9-11

[RUFFIAN]

REAL QUIET CHIRPS
“ Well it can't be Greatheart.“
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

When Have I EVER Played Any Under 12/1
Much Less 7/2 = Which Is Probably The Basis Of Your Comment

NOT GREATHEART

ROGUE ELEMENT

[Real Quiet]

And Rogue Element was my gut instinct. I don't see 20-1 though.

[RUFFIAN]

RQ
EQUIBASE ENTRIES
#6 ROGUE ELEMENT 20/1 Lanerie

[JolyB]

Originally Posted by RUFFIAN

RQ
EQUIBASE ENTRIES
#6 ROGUE ELEMENT 20/1 Lanerie

Ruff, I think that RQ's comment had a very different meaning than you surmised. His "I don't see 20-1" might well be his way of saying that even though Rogue Element has been listed in the ML at 20-1, by the time he goes to post the bettors will have pushed his odds well below the 20-1 you are hoping for. They will look at the fact that he has won his last two races (although against weaker and one of them on the turf) and bet him accordingly. He also fits the conditions of this race very snugly. But I think that your minimum target of 12-1 odds is quite safe.

Don't mean to put words in another player's mouth - if I have misread the comment I apologize.

By the way, isn't it remarkable that Churchill is able to offer a purse of $127,000 for a NW1X or NW2L condition? That would be the purse for a stakes race at many other tracks.