ROI Results 12/1 @ Aqueduct / HD

[RUFFIAN]

{JOLY: “Betting to place? (As in "Place it all on...” }
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

THE REASON I DO “WIN ONLY” IS ~ ~ ~
USUALLY PLACE $$ IS TOO LOW TO MATTER IN ROI
I PREFER DIVIDING THE BANKROLL INTO 4 RACES

[DonGuido]

Originally Posted by RUFFIAN-333

{JOLY: “Betting to place? (As in "Place it all on...” }
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

THE REASON I DO “WIN ONLY” IS ~ ~ ~
USUALLY PLACE $$ IS TOO LOW TO MATTER IN ROI
I PREFER DIVIDING THE BANKROLL INTO 4 RACES

Although second place money is better than NUTTIN!!! And there's always W/P. But then again when you hit one of your fanciful feline or wild & wacky wagers, you need a Cyber Mac Truck to carry home!!!

[RUFFIAN]

(DON)
“... But then again when you hit one of your fanciful feline or
wild & wacky wagers, you need a Cyber Mac Truck to carry home!!!“

ITS ALL ABOUT FELINES....GRAYS...SIRES

Have never bothered with past performance, trainer, or jockey

WIN SOME ~ LOSE SOME
Of course I lose a lot more than I win
But at least it’s not REAL money

Now and then when I have Wagered for real...
IT PAID OFF BODACIOUSLY

SARAVA 70/1
GIACOMO 50/1
ONE DREAMER 47-1
THUNDER GULCH 26-1

I used to Go to a Private Turf Club every Saturday
Members were mostly big-time businessman making huge bets

Every time A GRAY horse or LONGSHOT Won a race
I could hear the men sitting behind me murmuring
“... oh Cat probably has that one”

So of course how could I resist that temptation
Of holding the winning ticket up in the air
With a grandiose grin on my feline face!

[cal828]

I still wince when I hear the name of Sarava and Thundergulch. I have done some pretty dumb things at the racetrack before, but probably none as dumb as with these 2 horses. I remember Sarava's race all too well. That was the year that it looked like Baffert might have the triple crown winner.
I considered Sarava and thought well, it might be a good idea to throw a place ticket on him and that wasn't the worst of it because he paid $50 bucks to place, but I also put a straight up exacta on him under Medaglia D'Oro and I imagine you know how they finished.

On Thundergulch, I remember that one all too well too. Was sharing a table with a lady at Oaklawn and she asked me who I liked. I said, "I like Thundergulch, but nobody else does, so I guess I'll pass."

But I guess, I've had a few winners too like Charasmatic and I was all over Pleasantly Perfect when he won the BC Classic and Drosselmeyer when he won the Belmont and some others I can't remember. Can't think of the maiden winner that Lukas won the Belmont with, but I had him too.

[RUFFIAN]

(CAL) “...few winners too like Charasmatic

I HAD CHARISMATIC = BUT HE WAS ONLY 17/1

What I find amazing is my “SELECTIVE MEMORY”

I can’t remember the name of somebody I met last week
{Probably Because They Don’t Have 4 Legs + Tails!}

Yet...I can remember horses that I bet on in the 1990s

[cal828]

Originally Posted by RUFFIAN-333

(CAL) “...few winners too like Charasmatic

I HAD CHARISMATIC = BUT HE WAS ONLY 17/1

What I find amazing is my “SELECTIVE MEMORY”

I can’t remember the name of somebody I met last week
{Probably Because They Don’t Have 4 Legs + Tails!}

Yet...I can remember horses that I bet on in the 1990s

I think you are wrong, but would have to look it up. I believe he was 32-1
in the Derby and still fairly long odds in the Preakness like 10-1 maybe, but maybe you are talking about another race.

[cal828]

Originally Posted by cal828

I think you are wrong, but would have to look it up. I believe he was 32-1
in the Derby and still fairly long odds in the Preakness like 10-1 maybe, but maybe you are talking about another race.

Sorry, I was wrong, it was only 31-1 on Charismatic.

[JolyB]

Originally Posted by cal828

Can't think of the maiden winner that Lukas won the Belmont with, but I had him too.

Cal, you've got me scratching my head over that one. The only Lukas Belmont winner that might fit your description is Commendable (2000), who was an absolute outsider in the Belmont. I sort of remember that Commendable had won one race as a 2 year old.

Other than that, I've drawn a blank.

[cal828]

Originally Posted by JolyB

Cal, you've got me scratching my head over that one. The only Lukas Belmont winner that might fit your description is Commendable (2000), who was an absolute outsider in the Belmont. I sort of remember that Commendable had won one race as a 2 year old.

Other than that, I've drawn a blank.

That's the one. I think he had only won a maiden race. Race was full of plodders and Lukas was smart enough to recognize it and put Commendable, who was a front runner type in the race and won it with Pat Day riding.

[Real Quiet]

I can't remember to get a loaf of bread in the morning but you guys remember horses that ran 18 years ago. No wonder I'm at a disadvantage (although I remember my first big score on Pass Catcher).