![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really hope they keep this bet at Belmont. I am surprised they waited this long to do it, I doubt highly it will cannibalize the pk6 or pk4.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think they would only have a late pk5 on cards of 10 or more races. I don't think they would want to overlap the last leg of the early pk5 with the first leg of the late pk5.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not ? What's the diff ? Isn't the pick 4 part of the pick 5 in Cali ?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
No
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
When they run 8 , how do they do it ?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
They overlap it with the 5th race in both.
NYRA runs the pk5 and pk4 in the early races. I haven't looked at the numbers but haven't heard any complaints that it ruins the early pk4. I still think they could do it on 9 race card once but I would prefer it late and I think they would increase overall handle if they did it that way. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I stand corrected Alabama
This is a very interesting topic. I don't believe it matters much when the overlap occurs with a last leg/first leg. I am going to check out average pool sizes for the last pick 3 of the day. You would think that if a longshot comes in on the first leg of the late P4, it should drive the late P3 pool up. I would also think the same at GP and KEE that if a longshot comes in 1st leg of P5, it would drive up the P4 pool. Vice versa, if an 8/5 comes in 1st leg of P4, will that tamp down the late P3 pool? Same with an 8/5 in a P5, will that affect the P4 pool? If I was carding races at a late P5 and P4 track, I would card the most difficult handicapping race 1st leg of P5. At only a late P4 track, same thing with the 1st leg. Wouldn't that drive up handle for those late wagers when 75% are out in leg one? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes,(starting with race 2)with the exception of DMR..........and DMR is costing themselves handle by not adding an early P-4 to the wagering menu.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tracks go with .50 Min's on P-3/4's because that's what the public wants.......as a result of the lower min's the handle on the Multi's goes up......so that's good for the track also.
It's a tax break for the player also if the payoff stays under $600 via a .50 score{no IRS window visit}. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|