Quote:
Originally Posted by GenuineRisk
I'm not quite sure whether this is intended to support or refute your earlier comment, jms, as, according to the article, the majority of the individuals listed were Bosnian (that crisis having been 20 years ago) which would make them a different time and a different set of refugees. What I took from the article is that radicals have gotten into the nation before, and the government does a pretty good job at catching them here, seeing as how white supremacists have killed more people in terrorist attacks here since 2002 than Islamic terrorists have.
I also knew a Bosnian refugee- he fled here with his family and I knew him when we moved into our previous apartment, as he was the super of the building. He and his wife had some pretty terrifying stories about the war/genocide, including having to flee their home as it was bombed to pieces around them.
God, humans can be terrible to one another.
|
I guess you read what you want.
So what you are saying is that 20 years later accepting refugees from countries openly hostile to the our country that have proven to be infiltrated is safer than accepting them from Bosnia 20 years back.
So when one of these commits a henious act of terrorism will you come here and say you were wrong or will you blame those tasked with ferreting out the proverbial needle in a haystack.