Churchill Downs Sues DRF for Oaks/Derby bet

[OTM Al]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

While neither of the entities involved are going to win popularity contests in the racing world, if it is indeed true that DRF Bets took wagers on the Derby and Oaks without a contract in place, then they are 1000000% wrong and should pay damages beyond the host fees they stiffed CD for.

CD increases their host fee on Oaks/Derby days because of the premium content (as do Pimlico and NYRA on Preakness/Belmont days). But, the suit makes it seem as if they have no contract with CDSN period, which means that DRF Bets cannot offer AP, FG, OP, IND, CD and a few other tracks. Can any DRF Bets customers on the board let us know if that's true?

They do not take any CDI tracks. I bet on a couple races Derby day and one or two the day before. I only use DRF Bets. On that day and the day before when I logged in, the screen said Xpressbets not DRF Bets. I believe Xpressbets took my bets that day, not DRF Bets. If this is deemed illegal, then I would appreciate CDI returning the money I bet those days as they should not benefit from it either. I would not have bet the Derby had Xpressbets not been taking my bets that day.