Quote:
Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane
The lesser part of the entry (as I suggested) would be the one to potentially do the herding. Just because some rabbits stay there until the end doesn't justify the fact that they are in the race to sacrifice their chances of winning to soften up another horse. In an uncoupled entry bettors who wagered on the rabbit in the vast majority of cases lose their money because the rabbit was in the race to compromise another horse.
Much of what I've read in this thread seems to be that bettors lost money on Sky Kingdom and they were taken advantage of because he was in the race only to compromise the chances of another horse at his own expense.
So my question is why is one form of " sacrifice " accepted and another is not?
|
like i said, just because one if a rabbit, doesn't mean he's going to be 'sacrificed' at all.
10-03-2014, 10:24 AM
Threaded Mode