|
|
 |
|
#11
10-01-2014, 11:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The real irony is that in speaking to a bunch of trainers, officials, owners and jockeys I have found support for suspending Espinoza and support for not suspending him. Probably close to 50-50.
I can see if there was a pre existing warning, him getting days here. I could see it if the Stewards had been proactive against similar aggressive riding tactics recently. I think they are simply punishing Espinoza because of grumbling about a popular horse (you know one of those that may "save" racing) and an unpopular trainer who almost benefited. Stewards are generally bad enough already. If we start letting popularity bleed into the decisions... 
|
Threaded Mode