![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That Baffert isn't livid with Espinoza is the only truth coming from him. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() And here is a tweet from a well respected horse racing guy....
Of course the outrage is not that Shared Belief was floated out, but that he was floated out by a Baffert longshot. That's horse racing. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Well that settles the issue.
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not at all, but you guys act like I'm the only one defending that side of it.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I've got tons of respect for Doug, but he's wrong here. Has nothing to do with Baffert other than he had to know what was going on. If he didn't then he should never ride Espinoza again. The issue is bettors who played Sky Kingdom did so under the pretense he would be ridden to actually win the race. His rider had other ideas. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not my kind of horse either, but also irrelevant.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So.....how does one say without using the odds that the horse in the 4 path wasnt ridden to win while the one in the 5 path who actually did win was? Sure you can assume that Smith didnt want to be out there and Espinoza did but now we are assuming as opposed to actually judging if any rules were violated. If the odds are a determining factor are we now holding rider on long shots to different standards than those riding favorites? Do we want Stewards decisions based on assumptions? Everybody knows everything about high profile stakes horses like SB and CC. Do the stewards or everyday player know if some horse in an allowance race doesnt like to be stuck inside and that is why the other jocks may try to pin him down? Do we want the top races judged differently than the everyday races? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I would have been totally fine if after meeting with the stewards, there was no suspension. At least they talked to him about it. That's all I'm asking for. More accountability. I acknowledge there is a ton of gray area with the policing of riding. I'd just like to see more questions being asked about questionable rides. If we take Baffert at his word, he knew nothing about what Espinoza was going to do. In that case the punishment is appropriate. Espinoza didn't put forth any effort to win. He should be punished. Plain and simple. Maybe (and it's a big maybe) if there was some accountability in the sport it might appeal to gamblers more. And yes, I fully realize other sports have accountability issues as well. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Serious question, if Ezpinoza took back and sat last and just tried to clunk up up get a 3rd or 4th place check, would that be considered putting forth an effort to win? I understand the perception is that Baffert and Espinoza tag teamed the other horse but there are a lot of perceptions in this business that are completely inaccurate despite looking from the outside like they make sense. IMO Ezpinoza figured that he had no chance and wanted to make his 3 year old "rival" work hard. People use the Baffert isn't pissed so he is guilty nonsense but he can read the form and perhaps hadn't even wanted to be in there with that horse. It is hard to conjure up a lot of animosity for a ride on a horse that hadnt prayer anyway, especially when you almost just won the race with your legitimate contender. I guess what drives me crazy more than anything is people not understanding the implications of stewards perhaps overly protecting big name horses and short priced favorites. Would this ride have gotten a journeyman rider a suspension in a cal bred maiden claimer? You say people want accountability which is easy to understand. However what isnt so easy to understand is how do you measure or quantify that? |