Extending the Payroll Tax Cut

[Riot]

Last year, when the Republicans went to the mat defending the wealthy, and refused to allow the Bush Tax Cuts for the wealthiest Americans only to expire, the trade-off bargained by the Dems agreeing to allow the Republicans richest Americans to keep their tax break on the highest of incomes, was to also temporarily initiate giving poor and middle class families a tiny tax break of their own, about $1000 a year more cash in their pockets, during the recession.

Oh. The Horror.

Now, the Republicans say the Dems can't continue that tiny tax break for the poor unless the Dems offset the cost. Which is really strange, because the Republicans have always directly and deliberately refused to offset the far greater cost of the massive 10-year-long Bush Tax Cuts For The Wealthy, which directly helped put our country trillions into deficit.

Occupy The Voting Booth. The choice is really clear.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Last year, when the Republicans went to the mat defending the wealthy, and refused to allow the Bush Tax Cuts for the wealthiest Americans only to expire, the trade-off bargained by the Dems agreeing to allow the Republicans richest Americans to keep their tax break on the highest of incomes, was to also temporarily initiate giving poor and middle class families a tiny tax break of their own, about $1000 a year more cash in their pockets, during the recession.

Oh. The Horror.

Now, the Republicans say the Dems can't continue that tiny tax break for the poor unless the Dems offset the cost. Which is really strange, because the Republicans have always directly and deliberately refused to offset the far greater cost of the massive 10-year-long Bush Tax Cuts For The Wealthy, which directly helped put our country trillions into deficit.

Occupy The Voting Booth. The choice is really clear.

If the wealthy, say top 25% of wage earners weren't already paying 85% or the top half paying over 95% of all personal income taxes you may have point. Sadly they do pay that and thus you don't have a point. What should the top 1/4 pay, 90%-95-100% of the total tab?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

What should the top 1/4 pay, 90%-95-100% of the total tab?

Why did the top wealthiest 1% get this special tax cut in the first place? The wealthiest shouldn't have received a special tax cut. Especially one that directly pushed this country into a deficit. Don't you agree?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Why did the top wealthiest 1% get this special tax cut in the first place? The wealthiest shouldn't have received a special tax cut. Especially one that directly pushed this country into a deficit. Don't you agree?

to right a wrong and no I don't agree

You know because almost half of what the top quarter pays comes from the top 1% (36.7% of all personal income tax paid) and while collectively 1%ers Adjusted Gross Income represents 16.9% of all income they are paying 37% of all collected personal income taxes. Look, no one here including me will likely ever meet much more be one of the 1,379,000 people filing returns that make up the 1% yet it doesn't make it right to covet even more of their money. They're doing quite enough as is. IMO and deserve a big THANK YOU rather than a payment due notice

[GenuineRisk]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

to right a wrong and no I don't agree

You know because almost half of what the top quarter pays comes from the top 1% (36.7% of all personal income tax paid) and while collectively 1%ers Adjusted Gross Income represents 16.9% of all income they are paying 37% of all collected personal income taxes. Look, no one here including me will likely ever meet much more be one of the 1,379,000 people filing returns that make up the 1% yet it doesn't make it right to covet even more of their money. They're doing quite enough as is. IMO and deserve a big THANK YOU rather than a payment due notice

Wow. Talk about being grateful for the crumbs from the lord's table.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk

Wow. Talk about being grateful for the crumbs from the lord's table.

He's learned his lesson well.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

to right a wrong and no I don't agree

You know because almost half of what the top quarter pays comes from the top 1% (36.7% of all personal income tax paid) and while collectively 1%ers Adjusted Gross Income represents 16.9% of all income they are paying 37% of all collected personal income taxes. Look, no one here including me will likely ever meet much more be one of the 1,379,000 people filing returns that make up the 1% yet it doesn't make it right to covet even more of their money. They're doing quite enough as is. IMO and deserve a big THANK YOU rather than a payment due notice

The following chart is from 2006 (it's worse now). Please tell me how much money one has to earn to be in the bottom 90-95% of American wage earners.

[Riot]

Winner take all: see the chart on the right? See the lines going down on the right? That's your "real income" over the past 30+ years (if you are not a millionaire or better)





http://motherjones.com/politics/2011...ca-chart-graph

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

The following chart is from 2006 (it's worse now). Please tell me how much money one has to earn to be in the bottom 90-95% of American wage earners.

fortunately we apparantly have come a long way as according to 2009 IRS data the bottom 90% includes filings for people who make about $120K and less. BTW a full 30.7% of returns filed were for between $50K and $200K (Middle Class)

Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saaz drawings maybe should be taken with a grain of salt.

"Table 1.1 Selected Income and Tax Items, by Size and Accumulated Size of
Adjusted Gross Income, Tax Year 2009"
(All figures are estimates based on samples—money amounts are in thousands of dollars except as indicated)
"Size and accumulated size
of adjusted gross income" All returns Taxable returns
"Number
of
returns" "Percent
of total" "Adjusted gross
income less deficit" "Number
of
returns" "Percent
of total" "Adjusted gross
income less deficit" Taxable income Income tax after credits Total income tax
"Number of
returns" Amount "Percent of
total" "Number of
returns" Amount "Percent of
total" Amount Percent of "Average
total income
tax (dollars)"
Amount "Percent
of total" "Average
(dollars)" Amount "Percent
of total" Total "Taxable
income" "Adjusted gross
income less deficit"

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20)
Size of Adjusted Gross Income
All returns 140,494,127 100.0 7,626,430,723 100.0 54,283 81,890,189 100.0 6,777,684,912 100.0 81,865,180 4,861,134,463 100.0 81,890,189 865,948,271 100.0 865,948,695 100.0 17.8 12.8 10,575
No adjusted gross income 2,511,925 1.8 -198,958,452 [1] -79,206 3,820 [2] -5,022,618 [1] 0 0 [1] 3,820 85,376 [2] 85,376 [2] [1] [1] 22,350
$1 under $5,000 10,447,635 7.4 27,218,608 0.4 2,605 306,587 0.4 830,784 [2] 305,868 338,359 [2] 306,587 40,278 [2] 40,278 [2] 11.9 4.8 131
$5,000 under $10,000 12,220,335 8.7 92,407,278 1.2 7,562 1,899,332 2.3 14,394,215 0.2 1,899,255 3,721,348 0.1 1,899,332 379,851 [2] 379,851 [2] 10.2 2.6 200
$10,000 under $15,000 12,444,512 8.9 155,465,805 2.0 12,493 2,883,906 3.5 37,631,534 0.6 2,883,614 12,407,258 0.3 2,883,906 848,075 0.1 848,075 0.1 6.8 2.3 294
$15,000 under $20,000 11,400,228 8.1 199,017,560 2.6 17,457 4,868,050 5.9 85,257,126 1.3 4,867,025 38,082,778 0.8 4,868,050 2,516,274 0.3 2,516,274 0.3 6.6 3.0 517
$20,000 under $25,000 10,033,887 7.1 225,167,737 3.0 22,441 4,639,085 5.7 104,534,890 1.5 4,636,559 53,814,808 1.1 4,639,085 4,669,410 0.5 4,669,410 0.5 8.7 4.5 1,007
$25,000 under $30,000 8,662,392 6.2 237,994,230 3.1 27,474 4,603,763 5.6 126,758,904 1.9 4,603,705 70,403,722 1.4 4,603,763 6,827,564 0.8 6,827,564 0.8 9.7 5.4 1,483
$30,000 under $40,000 14,371,647 10.2 499,879,773 6.6 34,782 9,589,845 11.7 334,967,281 4.9 9,587,862 202,334,691 4.2 9,589,845 20,151,883 2.3 20,151,883 2.3 10.0 6.0 2,101
$40,000 under $50,000 10,796,412 7.7 483,088,798 6.3 44,745 8,381,017 10.2 375,777,732 5.5 8,380,653 238,763,777 4.9 8,381,017 25,404,274 2.9 25,404,305 2.9 10.6 6.8 3,031
$50,000 under $75,000 18,694,893 13.3 1,149,068,817 15.1 61,464 16,449,394 20.1 1,015,872,390 15.0 16,448,878 669,393,075 13.8 16,449,394 77,962,073 9.0 77,962,073 9.0 11.6 7.7 4,740
$75,000 under $100,000 11,463,725 8.2 990,337,913 13.0 86,389 10,987,101 13.4 950,450,965 14.0 10,983,153 652,794,095 13.4 10,987,101 80,492,622 9.3 80,492,622 9.3 12.3 8.5 7,326
$100,000 under $200,000 13,522,048 9.6 1,801,446,897 23.6 133,223 13,374,553 16.3 1,783,386,440 26.3 13,370,297 1,299,639,179 26.7 13,374,553 212,290,589 24.5 212,290,589 24.5 16.3 11.9 15,873
$200,000 under $500,000 3,195,039 2.3 905,347,402 11.9 283,360 3,178,420 3.9 900,644,158 13.3 3,175,119 716,372,061 14.7 3,178,420 176,322,148 20.4 176,322,148 20.4 24.6 19.6 55,475
$500,000 under $1,000,000 492,568 0.4 332,037,478 4.4 674,095 489,904 0.6 330,211,356 4.9 488,542 279,531,278 5.8 489,904 80,458,186 9.3 80,458,186 9.3 28.8 24.4 164,233
$1,000,000 under $1,500,000 108,096 0.1 130,149,237 1.7 1,204,015 107,416 0.1 129,322,909 1.9 107,069 111,233,270 2.3 107,416 32,755,871 3.8 32,755,871 3.8 29.4 25.3 304,944
$1,500,000 under $2,000,000 44,273 [2] 76,148,200 1.0 1,719,969 44,015 0.1 75,707,933 1.1 43,859 65,463,554 1.3 44,015 19,393,235 2.2 19,393,235 2.2 29.6 25.6 440,605
$2,000,000 under $5,000,000 61,918 [2] 182,986,391 2.4 2,955,302 61,535 0.1 181,799,852 2.7 61,354 158,056,386 3.3 61,535 46,943,489 5.4 46,943,630 5.4 29.7 25.8 762,877
$5,000,000 under $10,000,000 14,322 [2] 97,493,167 1.3 6,807,231 14,236 [2] 96,926,824 1.4 14,187 84,462,502 1.7 14,236 24,617,005 2.8 24,617,005 2.8 29.1 25.4 1,729,208
$10,000,000 or more 8,274 [2] 240,133,885 3.1 29,022,708 8,211 [2] 238,232,237 3.5 8,180 204,322,325 4.2 8,211 53,790,072 6.2 53,790,324 6.2 26.3 22.6 6,551,008
Accumulated from Smallest Size of Adjusted Gross Income
No adjusted gross income 2,511,925 1.8 -198,958,452 [1] -79,206 3,820 [2] -5,022,618 [1] 0 0 [1] 3,820 85,376 [2] 85,376 [2] [1] [1] 22,350
$1 under $5,000 10,447,635 7.4 27,218,608 0.4 2,605 306,587 0.4 830,784 [2] 305,868 338,359 [2] 306,587 40,278 [2] 40,278 [2] 11.9 4.8 131

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

fortunately we apparantly have come a long way

No. Income inequality has not improved since 2009 as you profess, it has worsened.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/daily...uality-america

Watching you jump through hoops to defend a plutocracy is simply amazing.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

to right a wrong and no I don't agree

Okay - so you are in favor of that special unfinanced tax cut to the wealthiest of Americans, that pushed this country into trillions of deficit. And you are defending that.

But you are against continuing a much smaller temporary tax cut for everyone else who is not wealthy (middle class and poverty level). And you want the middle class and poverty level to pay more taxes.

But you say you are a libertarian.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Okay - so you are in favor of that special unfinanced tax cut to the wealthiest of Americans, that pushed this country into trillions of deficit. And you are defending that.

But you are against continuing a much smaller temporary tax cut for everyone else who is not wealthy (middle class and poverty level). And you want the middle class and poverty level to pay more taxes.

But you say you are a libertarian.]

You really don't get it.

Do you suppose a union, say the teachers union, got a 2% raise for its teachers, but an equal reduction to be made in contributions to the pension fund, it would be happy?

This is no tax break this is just moving money from your right pocket to your left hoping you don't lose any in the transfer.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

You really don't get it. .

Me? You are the one who professes to be "libertarian", yet you are blindly defending and trying to maintain an unfunded tax cut for the wealthy that cost this country trillions and put us in debt, while on the other hand trying to justify the poor and middle class paying increased taxes.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

to right a wrong and no I don't agree

You know because almost half of what the top quarter pays comes from the top 1% (36.7% of all personal income tax paid) and while collectively 1%ers Adjusted Gross Income represents 16.9% of all income they are paying 37% of all collected personal income taxes. Look, no one here including me will likely ever meet much more be one of the 1,379,000 people filing returns that make up the 1% yet it doesn't make it right to covet even more of their money. They're doing quite enough as is. IMO and deserve a big THANK YOU rather than a payment due notice

the top 1% controls about 42% of the money, perhaps they should pay 42% of the taxes as well. they can certainly afford it!
that's not coveting, i'm certainly not going to get a penny of it.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

the top 1% controls about 42% of the money, perhaps they should pay 42% of the taxes as well. they can certainly afford it!
that's not coveting, i'm certainly not going to get a penny of it.

If taxes are to be paid on what one 'controls' then yes that would seem logical. And that may be a way to go. But then again we'd tax foundations, what stock and retirement portfolios one might have equity in home(s), commercial real estate and what businesses are worth. Not too business or investment friendly though. And would be a shame to tax two guys who work side by side and earn the same wages 50K and 5K because the guy taxed 5K had a few DUI's and made a couple of bad investments, has no home or retirement savings while the other guy saved as much as he could, worked a second job and invested in rental properties in lieu of lawyer fees and fines.

Meanwhile we tax by earned Adjusted Gross Income and while the top 1% earn 17 percent of all income they pay 37% of all taxes. So should their taxes be reduced by over half?

[Danzig]

the tax code needs revisiting. things need to be changed. people talk about job creation; that should be the thing that gets you the biggest deduction, not a donation to an art museum for example. the more people working, and getting paid a good wage, the better off everyone and everything is.

and i'd love to see my retirement grow to the point i'm in the 1%. yeah, not holding my breath.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Danzig

the top 1% controls about 42% of the money, perhaps they should pay 42% of the taxes as well. they can certainly afford it!
that's not coveting, i'm certainly not going to get a penny of it.

the top 1 percent of earners account for 20.3 percent of total personal income in the United States and pay 21.5 percent of all federal and state taxes.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...o-they-pay-now

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

the top 1 percent of earners account for 20.3 percent of total personal income in the United States and pay 21.5 percent of all federal and state taxes.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...o-they-pay-now

For Federal Income taxes using Adjusted Gross Income, it's just under 17% of total income and just under 37% of taxes paid. (2009 numbers.) Just sayin.

Table 1
Summary of Federal Income Tax Data, 2009


Number of Returns with Positive AGI
AGI ($ millions)
Income Taxes Paid ($ millions)
Group's Share of Total AGI
Group's Share of Income Taxes
Income Split Point
Average Tax Rate

Top 1%
1,379,822
$1,324,572
$318,043
16.9%
36.7%
$343,927.00
24.01%

Source: Internal Revenue Service

http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/250.html

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

the top 1 percent of earners account for 20.3 percent of total personal income in the United States and pay 21.5 percent of all federal and state taxes.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...o-they-pay-now

when i asked google, this was the top article in the results:

http://www.mybudget360.com/top-1-per...f-mega-wealth/

'42 percent of financial wealth is controlled by the top 1 percent.'