![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
You didn't make much of a defense for the allegedly pace-invulnerable Ghostzapper's near upset in the 2004 Woodward. Quote:
You should have given her the "hypotheticals are a waste of my precious time" lecture, not me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I had no idea how clueless so many of you are. Everyone knows this title belongs to Peppers Pride. She was undefeated!!! DUHHHH
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() English Channel is going to be devistated when he hears about this.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Ghostzapper was never keen or rank early in any of his route races. He let Saint Liam go early in the Woodward and he tracked Presidentialaffair in the Iselin. He took the lead in the Classic because he drew the rail. He proved over and over when sprinting that as long as you kept him outside of horses, he had no problem waiting for his cue. Suggesting he couldn't rate against top flight speed horses is silly. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think beating a horse of Saint Liam's caliber (no matter the margin) is a point in GZ's favor.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I disagree with regards to the margin of victory. I dominant horse that typically wins his races by open lengths suddenly winning by a mere neck suggests that he might have been, among other possibilities, compromised by race dynamics.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Isn't the fact that he ran a 114 BSF and defeated an excellent horse while being so compromised a testament to GZ's greatness? |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I never said Ghostzapper wasn't great. I merely said, at classic distances, he'd be vulnerable in heavy pace scenarios. Thus, I could see a horse like Cigar getting the better of him, at least some of the time. Not completely outlandish, IMO. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Disagreeing is trashing? I didn't trash anyone, and I'm quite sure Miraja can defend her opinion. I personally find it useless to discuss hypotheticals - they can't be proven. Tearing down one horse's accomplishments to prop up another denigrates them both. I posted a hypothetical in response to Miraja's which prompts another hypothetical, and so on, and so on. It gets ridiculous after awhile.
__________________
I l ![]() "Be daring, be different, be impractical, be anything that will assert integrity of purpose and imaginative vision against the play-it-safers, the creatures of the commonplace, the slaves of the ordinary.” Cecil Beaton |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks for the vote of confidence.....and the sex change.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|