![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I will ask once again. Who was better?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Yankees are now winning games on broken bat hits by Marcus Thames and Kerry Wood pickoff moves. They are phlegm. And Cliff Lee is sitting in the dugout saying..."yep, I'm throwin for them guys next year!".
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() texas was hanging their heads like they lost the 7th game......that was bad.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Rangers have pitching weaknesses. Yanks will find a pitching weakness. Buying up the best hitters will do that. Phils usually do (as well.) Rays don't. Giants don't. Braves (NOT IN THE POST.) Rangers are better at doing it early than late. Twins are better at doing it in the regular season. Their own pitching is not good enough (unless they hit mighty.)
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Offensively, who's teams have been consistently worse in the post? LaRussa won a ring (a few years ago) with crap. He's better. Lasorda won a ring in '88 with one REAL good starting pitcher, Gibby, and a rare Scioscia man up. While he was a rather mediocre strategic manager, his teams twice man'd up in the post. Didn't he go to the big show 4 times, and win 2? Wasn't supposed to win either of them. I just think Bobby was a short-term weak motivational individual. Obviously, he was better at that over 162 games.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|