The "New" Pac-10?

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by slotdirt

Yeah, well Michigan didn't have a single player drafted in the first round of the 2009 draft while Baylor, Wake Forest, Northern Illinois, and Connecticut did. I'm not sure that puts that foursome ahead of Michigan in the college football heirarchy.

i was just kicking sc while they're rolled up in a ball on the ground anyway.

it felt good.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

i was just kicking sc while they're rolled up in a ball on the ground anyway.

it felt good.

at least we dont have to hear from Booth Operator about the Trojans potentially being National Champs in 2010 and 2011!!

[ddthetide]

i heard today that TAM has been in contact with the SEC office. SEC is their preference.

since no one seems to want KU & KSU maybe the best place for them is CUSA. they'd be competitive in football and own the conference in b-ball.

[otisotisotis]

Originally Posted by ddthetide

i heard today that TAM has been in contact with the SEC office. SEC is their preference.

since no one seems to want KU & KSU maybe the best place for them is CUSA. they'd be competitive in football and own the conference in b-ball.

dd- i would take them and Missouri, round it off with 2 of these - Ga Tech, Va Tech, FSU, or the U.

but who knows what the SEC has in mind.....although I thought I read that if they were to expand, they could renegotiate the ESPN deal....

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

at least we dont have to hear from Booth Operator about the Trojans potentially being National Champs in 2010 and 2011!!

Or 2005

[slotdirt]

I would presume someone in Sooner Nation is printing out 2005 MNC shirts already.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by slotdirt

I would presume someone in Sooner Nation is printing out 2005 MNC shirts already.

lol, they are still not the NC's. there will be no BSC NC for that year.