Kagan ?

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Actually, if you read into it a little.. you will find out that Harvard has an anti-discrimination policy, which she felt, and over 30 other colleges also felt the exact same way, that DADT violated her school's policy. (she is correct there)

AND, she didnt ban them from campus.. She banned them for having an office building on campus.

She had every right to stand up for her school's policy and for what is right. If people never stood up for what is right, nothing good would ever happen.

She obviously did not have every right to do it and that is why she lost unanimously when the case went to the Supreme Court.

In terms of "standing up for what is right" and "what is moral", that is completely subjective. If I am the Governor of California and I am opposed to abortion because I think it is immoral, should I try to shut down abortion clinics, even though abortion is legal in California?

[AeWingnut]

Owebomba likes to nominate people that have been overruled by the Supreme Court and are completely unqualified for the position. (just like him)

I'm certain she is a good little Marxist

and she will be treated with more respect than she deserves or would get if she were a republican nominee.

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

Owebomba likes to nominate people that have been overruled by the Supreme Court and are completely unqualified for the position. (just like him)

I'm certain she is a good little Marxist

and she will be treated with more respect than she deserves or would get if she were a republican nominee.

You mean she'll be named Chief Justice too?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by GBBob

You mean she'll be named Chief Justice too?

No but she won't be grilled about Long Dong Silver or a pubic hair on a coke can like the Republican nominee not to mention a Republican nominee of color.

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by GBBob

You mean she'll be named Chief Justice too?

I mean she will not be threatened with gang rape like Sandra (no talent unfunny hack) Bernhard did with Sarah (more qualified to be president than Owebomba) Palin

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

I mean she will not be threatened with gang rape like Sandra (no talent unfunny hack) Bernhard did with Sarah (more qualified to be president than Owebomba) Palin

Since I disagree with everything you wrote, I will pass

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

No but she won't be grilled about Long Dong Silver or a pubic hair on a coke can like the Republican nominee not to mention a Republican nominee of color.

funny how people believe Anita Hill but Kathleen Willy, Juanita Broderick and Paula Jones are all lying whores

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

funny how people believe Anita Hill but Kathleen Willy, Juanita Broderick and Paula Jones are all lying whores

Obviously, they didn't believe her.

[Antitrust32]

Who / what is Owebomba??????? Is that a name of a song or something?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by miraja2

lol
thanks miraja. i actually had a guy say the other day he couldn't handle being with someone like me-i'm too 'feisty'. lmao. his wife is great, but she's far from feisty.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

It was nor her job to impose her views on everyone else. If she thinks that DADT is immoral, that is fine. She is entitled to her opinion. But it was not her place to try to keep the military off campus because of her disapproval of DADT.

Talk about immoral. It was immoral for her to try to restrict access to campus to a group that is entitled by law to have access to the campus.

DADT in my opinion is not only immoral, but unconstitutional. your analagy about being governor and barring clinics doesn't really apply either, since california isn't a private college. i can't say i blame harvard for making it difficult for the military to recruit, considering said military is discriminatory in this respect. it pains me to be critical, as i generally am supportive of my former employer. however, they are out of line on this. i hope it changes soon.

as for kagan-it seems to me that those of the other party than obama are shrilly hollering she's unfit, while feverishly searching for a reason why. if this case is the best they can do, i think she'll be passed with flying colors.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by Danzig

lol
thanks miraja.

Well, everything you said is entirely accurate. The blatantly sexist way in which a strikingly large number of people (primarily, but not exclusively, men) respond in situations like this is ridiculous.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by Danzig

lol
thanks miraja. i actually had a guy say the other day he couldn't handle being with someone like me-i'm too 'feisty'. lmao. his wife is great, but she's far from feisty.

Stepford wife....obviously

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by Danzig

DADT in my opinion is not only immoral, but unconstitutional. your analagy about being governor and barring clinics doesn't really apply either, since california isn't a private college. i can't say i blame harvard for making it difficult for the military to recruit, considering said military is discriminatory in this respect. it pains me to be critical, as i generally am supportive of my former employer. however, they are out of line on this. i hope it changes soon.

as for kagan-it seems to me that those of the other party than obama are shrilly hollering she's unfit, while feverishly searching for a reason why. if this case is the best they can do, i think she'll be passed with flying colors.

other than having real Americans saying she isn't qualified -
Are there reasons for her to be a Supreme Court Justice?

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by GBBob

Since I disagree with everything you wrote, I will pass

you drank the water?
there's nothing we can do
there's no one we can call

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

Who / what is Owebomba??????? Is that a name of a song or something?

yes - it's a song like Kumbaya

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by miraja2

Well, everything you said is entirely accurate. The blatantly sexist way in which a strikingly large number of people (primarily, but not exclusively, men) respond in situations like this is ridiculous.

Wow never knew pointing out lack of experience was sexist.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

other than having real Americans saying she isn't qualified -
Are there reasons for her to be a Supreme Court Justice?

exactly what does your first sentence mean?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Wow never knew pointing out lack of experience was sexist.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Danzig

DADT in my opinion is not only immoral, but unconstitutional. your analagy about being governor and barring clinics doesn't really apply either, since california isn't a private college. i can't say i blame harvard for making it difficult for the military to recruit, considering said military is discriminatory in this respect. it pains me to be critical, as i generally am supportive of my former employer. however, they are out of line on this. i hope it changes soon.

as for kagan-it seems to me that those of the other party than obama are shrilly hollering she's unfit, while feverishly searching for a reason why. if this case is the best they can do, i think she'll be passed with flying colors.

You say DADT is "immoral and unconstitutional". Many people say the new law in Arizona is "immoral and unconsititutional". People sure love to throw out the line "immoral and unconstitutional" when they disagree with something.

I think banning PG1985 from this board was "immoral and unconstitutional". LOL.