![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have honestly quoted to you the proven, unquestionable science. I have tried to give you the real facts. You have always simply ignored it or dismissed it out of hand as you did above. You can't refute the science, it's what it is. The facts matter. The truth matters. That isn't my opinion, it's just the truth. My opinion is formed by the truth. You're is formed in your imagination. You have always, and continue to, ignore discussing the issue of lasix from a factual scientific basis. You deny proven science exists. You simply, purposely ignore whatever doesn't fit your opinion. Thus "debating" you on lasix is futile, and a colossal waste of time, because you don't ever debate honestly from the basis of truthful scientific fact about the drug. Quote:
Quote:
When a horse is running on a high-speed treadmill set at 16 meters/second squared - yeah. We "do" know how to measure speed. And yeah - we know how to do those "statistics" things when examining 27,000+ horses that race in Australia, North and South America, and South Africa, too. Dismissing the hard, proven science out of hand - not any "new" information, mind you, but studies whose facts have been independently verified and repeated over and over by scientists in multiple disciplines - is what make the "anti-lasix" argument folks a complete loser. You might as well embrace creationism to further your arguments about lasix. It's the same thing as your blatant dismissal of all proven science. I repeat: Thus "debating" you on lasix is futile, and a colossal waste of time, because you don't ever debate honestly from the basis of truthful scientific fact about the drug.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |