![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm a veterinarian that agrees with the 99.99% of veterinary medical and scientific professionals that lasix is a necessary and good therapeutic medication whose use must be continued for the health and welfare of the race horse, and should not be considered a "performance enhancer". I am listed on published scientific papers on the effect of lasix in race horses, and I have read the majority, if not all, of scientific information on the effect of lasix in race horses. I've never read any studies that support your contention, that lasix is a strict performance enhancer. Only studies that contradict it. So I'm really interested in your "facts", as your contention, unsupported by the veterinary medical community, is 100% of the argument against using this valuable therapeutic medication to help horses. ** The common way for "seasoned horse players" to bet horses is first or second use lasix. There's some interesting scientific data related to that. To bad horse players ignore science ![]() But that doesn't have anything to do with the odd allegation that "lasix is a performance enhancer in all horses that moves horses up lengths". I'll be interested to see your "proof". Can't wait.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |